A dräger technician evaluated the device on-site; the reported issue of ventilator failure during the particular surgery was confirmed.Based on the findings it was decided to replace the ventilator motor unit; an additional issue with the power supply was corrected as well.The device passed all consecutive tests and could be returned to use without further problems reported to date.The ventilator failure was related to the aspect that the supervisor function detected a wrong motor position and forced a shut-down of automatic ventilation during the particular surgery.Such a shut-down is accompanied by the corresponding vent fail alarm; manual ventilation with the built-in breathing bag will be possible and, the monitoring functions remain unaffected.It can be concluded that replacement of the ventilator motor unit was an appropriate measure to put back the device into fully operable condition.The particular anesthesia device was in operation for 13 years now.Wear-and-tear related abrasion of the collector disc has led to intermittent contact loss to the carbon brushes which resulted in speed fluctuations.These speed fluctuations may cause potentially hazardous output or severe mechanical damages to the ventilator unit and thus, the device is designed to force a safety shut-down of automatic ventilation.The number of similar cases, related to the same root cause, is within the expected range of the respective risk assessment and thus accepted.Remark: during review of data for complaint closure was determined that the decision to report was filed in time but there was no initial mdr submitted within the applicable time frame, accidentally.
|