• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: TERUMO CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS CORPORATION ADVANCED PERFUSION SYSTEM 1; CONSOLE, HEART-LUNG MACHINE, CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS-ADVANCED PERFUSION SYSTEM 1

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

TERUMO CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS CORPORATION ADVANCED PERFUSION SYSTEM 1; CONSOLE, HEART-LUNG MACHINE, CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS-ADVANCED PERFUSION SYSTEM 1 Back to Search Results
Model Number 802111
Medical Device Problem Code Device Alarm System (1012)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 11/15/2021
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The field service representative (fsr) could not duplicate the reported complaint.The fsr replaced the level sensor module and both of the level sensors.Verification/release testing was preformed.The unit operated to the manufacturer's specifications.The yellow level sensor that was replaced: pn: 195215, sn: (b)(4), manufacturer date: 21-dec-2000.The red level sensor that was replaced: pn: 195274, sn: (b)(4), udi: (b)(4).The suspect parts were returned to the manufacturer for further evaluation.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that prior to use of the device for a cardiopulmonary bypass (cpb) procedure, the level sensors were continuously alarming.As a mitigation, the level sensors were turned off.The surgical procedure was completed successfully.There was no delay, no blood loss, nor adverse consequences to the patient.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The reported complaint was confirmed.During laboratory analysis, the product surveillance technician (pst) connected the level module and level sensors to lab use only (luo) testing equipment.The system was monitored for three hours and 12 minutes with no observations of the unit inadvertently alerting or alarming.It was determined that the level module and level sensors met specification.Per data log review: on (b)(6) 2021, the level log showed many alarm probe status changes from coupled to uncoupled to coupled.This will cause 'level not attached' alerts (not alarms), which is most likely what the end user was reporting.The log confirms the complaint.If additional information becomes available on this complaint that would alter the facts and/or conclusion, a supplemental report will be filed accordingly.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ADVANCED PERFUSION SYSTEM 1
Common Device Name
CONSOLE, HEART-LUNG MACHINE, CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS-ADVANCED PERFUSION SYSTEM 1
Manufacturer (Section D)
TERUMO CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS CORPORATION
6200 jackson road
ann arbor MI 48103
Manufacturer (Section G)
SAME
Manufacturer Contact
douglas patton
6200 jackson road
ann arbor, MI 48103
7346634145
MDR Report Key12971310
Report Number1828100-2021-00467
Device Sequence Number19937514
Product Code DTQ
UDI-Device Identifier00886799000717
UDI-Public(01)00886799000717(11)171201
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateNJ
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K172220
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 02/02/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model Number802111
Device Catalogue Number802111
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer12/01/2021
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 11/15/2021
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer01/26/2022
Initial Report FDA Received Date12/09/2021
Supplement Report FDA Received Date02/02/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured12/01/2017
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) No
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-