|
Patient weight and ethnicity: unknown, information not provided.If implanted, give date: not applicable, as there is no indication that the lens was implanted if explanted, give date: not applicable, as there is no indication that the lens was implanted therefore it was not explanted.The device was not returned for analysis, therefore a failure analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.A review of the device history record, complaint trending, and risk documentation for this device will be performed.Upon completion of the review, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch will be filed.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|
|
Additional information: section d9: device available for evaluation? yes.Section d9: returned to manufacturer on: 1/6/2022.Section h3: device evaluated by manufacturer¿ yes.Device evaluation: the complaint lens was received in the original lens case wrapped in tissue.Visual inspection under magnification revealed viscoelastic residue on the optic body and haptics, which is consistent with a lens that was handled for deployment.Haptic damage was not observed before or after cleaning the lens and no other defects were observed either.The complaint issue could not be confirmed.Manufacturing records review: the manufacturing records for the device were reviewed.The product was manufactured and released according to specification.A search in complaint system revealed one file that is not related for this production order number.Conclusion: as a result of the investigation there is no indication of a product quality deficiency and the reported issue could not be verified.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|