| Model Number |
VERSION 1.0 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Break (1069)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
11/16/2021
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
As the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records will be performed.The sample was not returned to the manufacturer for inspection/evaluation.Therefore, the investigation of the reported event is inconclusive.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause for this event is unknown.The instructions for use (ifu) is adequate for the reported device/patient code(s) and provides general instructions for use, as well as warnings, precautions and potential complications associated with the device.Upon receipt of new or additional information, a follow-up report will be submitted as applicable.The medical device manufacturer and manufacturing location for the straub product was selected as unknown due to system limitations.The correct medical device manufacturer and manufacturing location are straub medical us.Medical device expiry date: 09/2023.Device not returned.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that during a recanalization procedure through the femoral artery to treat the right distal superficial femoral artery and proximal popliteal, the distal portion of the device allegedly fractured.The fractured portion of the device was removed successfully.The procedure was completed using a competitive device.There was no reported patient injury.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The medical device manufacturer (d3) and manufacturing location (g1) for the straub product was selected as unknown due to system limitations.The correct medical device manufacturer and manufacturing location are straub medical us.H10: manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was conducted and there was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event.Investigation summary: the sample was returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.The catheter and the guidewire were physically investigated.The catheter showed no malfunction, the guidewire was broken at 75 cm distal.The reported breakage of the guidewire can be confirmed.Therefore, the investigation is confirmed for the reported break issue.A definitive root cause could not be determined based upon the available information.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documentation (e.G.Procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, nursing guide, and unit label) did not find any product labeling inadequacy.H11: section a through f ¿ the information provide by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that during a recanalization procedure through the femoral artery to treat the right distal superficial femoral artery and proximal popliteal, the distal portion of the device allegedly fractured.The fractured portion of the device was removed successfully.The procedure was completed using a competitive device.There was no reported patient injury.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|