• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS IOL; EXTENDED DEPTH OF FOCUS IOL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS IOL; EXTENDED DEPTH OF FOCUS IOL Back to Search Results
Model Number DFW150
Medical Device Problem Code Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Visual Disturbances (2140)
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Date of event: exact date unknown/not provided.Best estimate date is between (b)(6) 2021-(b)(6) 2021.The device was not returned for analysis.Therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.A review of the device history record, complaint trending, and risk documentation for this device will be performed.Upon completion of the review, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch will be filed.Attempts have been made to obtain missing information; however, no definitive response has been received.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that an intraocular lens (iol) was explanted from the patient's operative eye due to the patient persistently complained of dysphotopsia.No additional information was provided to johnson & johnson surgical vision.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: section d9: device available for evaluation? yes.Section d9: returned to manufacturer on: 1/12/2022.Section h3: device evaluated by manufacturer¿ yes.Device evaluation: the complaint lens was received inside of a specimen cup.Visual inspection under magnification revealed viscoelastic residue on the optic body and haptics and that the lens was received cut (not separated), which is consistent with a lens that was handled during explant.A detached haptic was observed, which can be attributed to handling.Based on the return condition of the lens, no further evaluation could be performed.The complaint issue could not be confirmed, and no product deficiency could be identified.Further information was provided on the specimen cup that notes patient's date of birth: (b)(6) 1948.Therefore, the following section has been updated accordingly: section a2: age/date of birth: (b)(6) 1948.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TECNIS IOL
Common Device Name
EXTENDED DEPTH OF FOCUS IOL
Manufacturer (Section D)
AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC.
road 402 north, anasco ind. pk
anasco PR 00610
Manufacturer Contact
somyata nagpal
31 technology drive
irvine, CA 92618
7142478552
MDR Report Key13004755
Report Number3012236936-2021-00252
Device Sequence Number4830118
Product Code MFK
UDI-Device Identifier05050474751347
UDI-Public(01)05050474751347(17)240821
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateCA
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P980040
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2021
Device Explanted Year2021
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 03/01/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date08/21/2024
Device Model NumberDFW150
Device Catalogue NumberDFW150U240
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer01/12/2022
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 11/17/2021
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer02/11/2022
Initial Report FDA Received Date12/14/2021
Supplement Report FDA Received Date03/01/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured08/21/2021
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient SexFemale
-
-