| Model Number |
1012278-15 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Material Separation (1562); Failure to Advance (2524)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Foreign Body In Patient (2687); No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
09/09/2021
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The device was received.Investigation is not yet complete.A follow-up report will be submitted with all additional relevant information.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that the 4.00x15 mm trek balloon dilatation catheter (bdc) did not cross the lesion due to the anatomy.The patient was treated with another trek bdc.There were no adverse patient effects and there was no reported clinically significant delay in the procedure.No additional information was provided.The device was returned and device analysis identified a separated distal shaft and the separated portion was not returned.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The device was received.Investigation is not yet complete.A follow-up report will be submitted with all additional relevant information.H6 health effect - impact codes 2199, 4582 removed; 2687 added.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that the 4.00x15 mm trek balloon dilatation catheter (bdc) did not cross the lesion due to the anatomy.The patient was treated with another trek bdc.There were no adverse patient effects and there was no reported clinically significant delay in the procedure.No additional information was provided.The device was returned and returned device analysis identified a separated distal shaft and the separated portion was not returned.It is possible the distal shaft remains in the patient anatomy as follow-up with the site was not able to confirm the location of the device.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
N/a.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Visual inspection was performed on the returned device.The reported failure to advance could not be replicated in a testing environment as it was based on operational circumstances.Additionally, return analysis noted a shaft separation, multiple kinks, stretching, wrinkles and corkscrew like material all over the inner, outer member and hypotube.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history of the reported lot did not indicate a lot specific quality issue.The investigation determined the reported failure to advance appears to be related to circumstance of the procedure.The investigation was unable to determine a conclusive cause for the noted separation, multiple kinks, stretching, wrinkles and corkscrew like material all over the inner, outer member and hypotube and reported foreign body in patient.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respects to the design, manufacture, or labeling of the device.E1: name updated e3: occupation changed from physician to non-healthcare professional.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|