• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MICROVENTION, INC. FRED 27; FLOW DIVERTER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MICROVENTION, INC. FRED 27; FLOW DIVERTER Back to Search Results
Model Number FRED3511-PMA
Device Problem Migration (4003)
Patient Problem Aneurysm (1708)
Event Date 11/18/2021
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
A search for non-conformances associated with the reported part/lot number combination did not reveal any production-related issues relevant to the complaint that occurred during manufacturing of the device.The device was returned to the manufacturer for analysis; however, investigation is not complete and still ongoing.The instructions for use (ifu) identifies migration or misplacement, and hemorrhage, including intracranial hemorrhage (ich), subarachnoid hemorrhage (sah) as potential complications associated with use of the device.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the fred 27 stent was used in an aneurysm embolization procedure.Upon deployment, the sent appeared normal and in the correct position.Post deployment angiogram showed the stent migrated distally from the vertebral artery into the v-b junction and no longer covering the aneurysm.The decision was made to place a second fred device to cover the aneurysm.A "j'd" syncro soft wire was attempted to pass through the stent to facilitate the second fred device.The moment the wire touched the initial fred stent device, the stent migrated further distally into the mid-basilar segment.Attempts to retrieve the stent using multiple techniques including snares were unsuccessful.After several hours the physicians decided to make another attempt the next morning and wake the patient up to assess neurological status.The patient was put on an integrillin drip, brilinta, double dose asa and full heparinization.The following morning additional attempts were made and the fred device was retrieved with the "loop and snare technique." patient suffered a minor subarachnoid hemorrhage (sah).Current patient condition described as "patient is neurologically intact with no focal deficits.".
 
Manufacturer Narrative
A search for non-conformances associated with the reported part/lot number combination did not reveal any production-related issues relevant to the complaint that occurred during manufacturing of the device.The device was returned to the manufacturer for analysis; however, investigation is not complete and still ongoing.The instructions for use (ifu) identifies migration or misplacement, and hemorrhage, including intracranial hemorrhage (ich), subarachnoid hemorrhage (sah) as potential complications associated with use of the device.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the fred 27 stent was used in an aneurysm embolization procedure.Upon deployment, the sent appeared normal and in the correct position.Post deployment angiogram showed the stent migrated distally from the vertebral artery into the v-b junction and no longer covering the aneurysm.The decision was made to place a second fred device to cover the aneurysm.A "j'd" syncro soft wire was attempted to pass through the stent to facilitate the second fred device.The moment the wire touched the initial fred stent device, the stent migrated further distally into the mid-basilar segment.Attempts to retrieve the stent using multiple techniques including snares were unsuccessful.After several hours the physicians decided to make another attempt the next morning and wake the patient up to assess neurological status.The patient was put on an integrilin drip, brilinta, double dose asa and full heparinization.The following morning additional attempts were made and the fred device was retrieved with the "loop and snare technique." patient suffered a minor subarachnoid hemorrhage (sah).Current patient condition described as "patient is neurologically intact with no focal deficits.".
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: h3, h6, h10 (summary device evaluation).Summary of device evaluation: analysis was conducted on the dicom images that were provided and based on the images, it appeared that the proximal end of fred was under significant tension during deployment along the inner curvature of v4 segment of vertebral artery.This may have resulted in the proximal end of the device to get stretched.It was also evident that the proximal end of fred had poor wall apposition with proximal neck of aneurysm during deployment and post deployment.Non tapered location of implant deployment and lack of vessel curvature/tortuosity reduces device anchorage at implantation site.The stent was returned damage, and due to the damage, the stent was unable to be loaded for further evaluation.The portion where the stent diameter can be verified is within specification.The physical evaluation of the device could not identify the conditions or circumstances that led to the damage, but the damage is consistent with the device experiencing forces over specification.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
FRED 27
Type of Device
FLOW DIVERTER
Manufacturer (Section D)
MICROVENTION, INC.
35 enterprise
aliso viejo CA 92656
Manufacturer Contact
terrence callahan
35 enterprise drive
aliso viejo, CA 92656
7142478000
MDR Report Key13014897
MDR Text Key285240149
Report Number2032493-2021-00497
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code OUT
UDI-Device Identifier00842429106662
UDI-Public(01)00842429106662(11)201109(17)231031(10)20110968X
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P180027
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 11/18/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date10/31/2023
Device Model NumberFRED3511-PMA
Device Lot Number20110968X
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer12/09/2021
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 11/18/2021
Initial Date FDA Received12/15/2021
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received11/18/2021
Supplement Dates FDA Received01/31/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured11/09/2020
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age42 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-