|
Model Number G58010 |
Device Problem
Migration (4003)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 10/07/2021 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
510(k): k192697.Investigation evaluation: a product evaluation was not performed in response to this report because the product said to be involved was not provided to cook for evaluation.The report could not be confirmed.The device history record for the lot number said to be involved was reviewed.A discrepancy or anomaly was not observed with the product that was released for distribution.Investigation conclusion: we could not conduct a complete investigation because the product said to be involved was not returned for evaluation.A definitive cause for the reported observation could not be determined.Prior to distribution, all instinct plus endoscopic clipping devices are subjected to a visual inspection and functional testing to ensure device integrity.A review of the device history record confirmed that the lot said to be involved met all manufacturing requirements prior to shipment.Corrective action: a review of the complaint history was conducted.The likelihood of occurrence is considered rare.Corrective action is not warranted at this time based on the quality engineering risk assessment.Quality assurance will continue to monitor for complaint trends and reassess the risk assessment results as post market feedback continues to become available.
|
|
Event Description
|
During a colonoscopy w/ multiple polypectomies, a cook instinct plus endoscopic clipping device was used.The clip deployed and then came off the tissue; it did not hold onto the tissue like it should.The procedure was successfully completed.Our attempts to collect specific patient outcome information were unsuccessful.Because the complainant stated that there was no clinical consequence to the patient, we can conclude that this information does not reasonably suggest the patient was adversely impacted.
|
|
Event Description
|
During a colonoscopy w/ multiple polypectomies, a cook instinct plus endoscopic clipping device was used.The clip deployed and then came off the tissue; it did not hold onto the tissue like it should.The procedure was successfully completed.An unintended section of the device did not remain inside the patient¿s body.The patient did not require any additional procedures due to this occurrence.According to the initial reporter, the patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
510(k): k192697.Investigation evaluation: the product said to be involved was returned in an open pouch from the lot number provided in the report.The label matches the product returned.Our laboratory evaluation of the product said to be involved could not confirm the report as it was described, because all the device components (particularly the clip) were not included in the return.During functional testing the device was advanced into the accessory channel of a pentax colonoscope (2.8 mm channel) which was placed in a simulated lower gi position.The tip of the endoscope was retroflexed to simulate worst case scenario.With handle manipulation, the drive wire was observed to move freely inside the outer sheath.A visual examination of the drive wire, catheter attachment, and coil catheter (distal end device components) showed no deformities or signs of damage.A product discrepancy or anomaly that could have contributed to the reported occurrence was not observed.The device history record for the lot number said to be involved was reviewed.A discrepancy or anomaly was not observed with the product that was released for distribution.Investigation conclusion: a definitive cause for the reported observation could not be determined because the condition of the product said to be involved prohibited a complete evaluation, the clip had been deployed and was not included in the return.A discrepancy or anomaly that could have contributed to the reported observation was not observed during our laboratory analysis of the returned product.Prior to distribution, all instinct plus endoscopic clipping devices are subjected to a visual inspection and functional testing to ensure device integrity.A review of the device history record confirmed that the lot said to be involved met all manufacturing requirements prior to shipment.Corrective action: a review of the complaint history was conducted.The likelihood of occurrence is considered rare.Corrective action is not warranted at this time based on the quality engineering risk assessment.Quality assurance will continue to monitor for complaint trends and reassess the risk assessment results as post market feedback continues to become available.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|