|
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. GNS II CMT TIB SIZE 6 LEFT; PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Model Number |
71420170 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993); Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth (4002)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Failure of Implant (1924); Laceration(s) (1946); Pain (1994); Loss of Range of Motion (2032); Osteolysis (2377); Swelling/ Edema (4577)
|
| Date of Event |
11/29/2021
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that, after a tkjr surgery had been performed on (b)(6) 2012, the patient reported an unknown problem.The adverse event was addressed with a revision surgery on (b)(6) 2021 to replace the tibial baseplate, femoral component and the insert.Additionally was observed that there was no cement on the back of the implant, indicating that the product had failed had the cement/implant interface.The condition of the patient is unknown.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
(b)(4).
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that, after a tkjr surgery had been performed on (b)(6) 2012, the patient reported suffering from major knee effusion, lysis, poor rom and pain.The adverse event was addressed with a revision surgery on (b)(6) 2021 to replace the tibial baseplate, femoral component and the insert.Additionally was observed that there was no cement on the back of the implant, indicating that the product had failed had the cement/implant interface.The patient is on early stage of recovery.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H3, h6: the device was not returned for evaluation.The pictures provided were reviewed and could not confirm the stated failure mode.The clinical/medical investigation concluded that, the reported ¿major knee effusion, lysis, poor rom and pain¿ may be consistent with the reported failure of the cement/implant interface; however, with the limited information provided the clinical root cause of the reported clinical reactions/ events cannot be confirmed.It cannot be concluded that the reported events/clinical reactions were associated with a mal performance of the implant or implant failure.A review of the manufacturing records did not reveal a manufacturing abnormality that could have caused or contributed to the reported incident.A review of complaint history for the part number over the past 12 months and for the batch number based on historical data of the device did not reveal similar events for the listed device.A review of the risk management file and instructions for use documents revealed this failure mode was previously identified.The anticipated risk level is still adequate.A historical review concluded that there are no prior actions related to this product and event.At this time, we have no reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any product specifications at the time of manufacture.Some potential probable causes could be alignment, fit/size of device used, failure of the cement/implant interface, surgical complications, traumatic injury or wear.The contribution of the device to the reported event could not be corroborated.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.Without the return of the actual product involved, our investigation could not proceed.Should the device or additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however, we will continue to monitor for future complaints and investigate as necessary.We consider this investigation closed.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|