|
This follow-up report is being submitted to relay additional information.The following sections were updated/corrected updated: b4, b5, g3, g6, h1, h2, h3, h6, h10.The device history records & receiving inspection report were reviewed for deviations and / or anomalies with no deviations and / or anomalies identified.Verified item lot combination and reviewed manufacturing date as tasp exhibits signs of repeated use (nicked or gouged).The dovetail feature is flared & compressed & is fractured on the lateral side of post.All pieces were returned.Medical records were not provided.The summary of investigations for complaints associated with the tibial articular surface provisional (tasp) fracture.Fractured tasps were analyzed by optical microscopy revealing hackle marks and river lines in the case of bending overload; and hackle marks, river lines and striations were found in the case of low cycle fatigue culminating in a bending overload failure type.Ongoing complaint monitoring confirms that the rate of instrument fracture is within the expected risk profile.A definitive root cause cannot be determined.If any further information is found which would change or alter any conclusions or information, a supplemental report will be filed accordingly.Zimmer biomet will continue to monitor for trends.
|