|
Model Number ICF100 |
Device Problem
Migration (4003)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 11/23/2021 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The investigation is still in progress; therefore, a conclusion has yet to be established.A supplemental report will be submitted accordingly upon investigation completion.Edwards will continue to review and monitor all reported events.Trends are monitored on a monthly basis and if action is required, appropriate investigation will be performed.
|
|
Event Description
|
Edwards received notification that an issue was experienced during use of an intraclude device model icf100.As reported, after proper positioning during the case it was observed the intraclude migrated through the aortic valve into the left ventricle.The intraclude was deflated after the mvr when it was noticed the improper placement.As reported, the occlusion was started and it was interrupted with return of cardiac electrical activity, might have happened 45 min.After occlusion.Neither intraclude or aortic valve were damaged.As per medical opinion, the intraclude migrated because of improper tension on the line when deployed, so there was room to mobilise distally toward the valve.All information pertinent to this case was received and documented in the file, as per last follow-up done with the sales rep.No further information could be obtained from the site.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H10: additional manufacturer narrative: updated sections h6 (component codes, type of investigation, investigation findings, investigation conclusions).Per the instructions for use (ifu), the balloon should be positioned just above the sino-tubular junction and vigilance during the case is required.There are multiple warnings in the ifu regarding possible balloon migration during the case and recommendations on mitigations to prevent migration of the balloon.The vast majority of migrations are easily detected and corrected during mis cases if significant balloon migration is not detected, it may result in damage of the aortic valve leaflets or myocardial ischemia from blockage of the coronary ostia.The root cause of this event was due to procedural/technique related factors.As per medical opinion, the intraclude migrated because of improper tension on the line when deployed, so there was room to mobilize distally toward the valve.Per the surgeon's opinion, the issue was not due to the device.Attempts have been made to obtain product for evaluation.The subject device was not returned for evaluation.The device history record (dhr) could not be reviewed, as the device lot number was not provided.However, the reported event does not allege a malfunction that could be related to a manufacturing deficiency and/or one was not confirmed through investigation.Edwards will continue to review and monitor all events.Trends are monitored on a monthly basis and if action is required, appropriate investigation will be performed.If new information becomes available, a supplemental report will be submitted.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|