• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BLUE BELT TECHNOLOGIES REAL INTELLIGENCE CORI; ORTHOPEDIC STEREOTAXIC INSTRUMENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BLUE BELT TECHNOLOGIES REAL INTELLIGENCE CORI; ORTHOPEDIC STEREOTAXIC INSTRUMENT Back to Search Results
Model Number ROB10024
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 11/30/2021
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was reported that a patient with a significant pre-operative varus alignment of 14 degrees underwent into a cori assisted tka surgery.The surgeon chose to adjust both the femur and tibia in 3 degrees of varus, making for a combined 6 degree varus post-operative alignment.For execution, the surgeon did a distal burr bone removal with the cori robot, placed his manual jii cut block, and checked the anterior cut slot for accuracy prior to cutting the femur.Then, used the visualize cut screen to place the manual tibia cut block to match the planned resections to less than a degree deviation from the plan, and cut the tibia with a saw blade.The surgeon did not make any additional soft tissue releases.During trialing, at the post-operative baseline screen, the leg alignment showed 10 degrees of varus, 4 more than what the surgeon had planned for.The post-operative x ray appears that the tibia baseplate is in excessive varus, ~ 7-8 degrees based off of the templating on the x ray.The patient was not harmed beyond the reported problem.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Internal complaint reference case-(b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H3, h6: the real intelligence cori, pn: rob10024, sn: (b)(6) used for treatment was not returned to the designated complaint unit for evaluation, therefore, visual and functional inspections could not be performed.Although the product was not returned the software files were downloaded from the device and provided for investigation.The log files do not indicate any system or software issue related to the reported complaint.The screenshots were reviewed with clinical account representatives.Screenshot review confirmed the pre-operative alignment of 14 degrees varus, as well as executing the planned 6 degree varus post-operative alignment where both the femur and tibia components were set to 3 degrees varus.The 10 degree varus post-operative alignment was also confirmed.The x-ray was also provided for investigation where it is evident that the tibia is sitting in excessive varus.However, the x-ray did not include the hip and ankle, and the alignment of the knee could not be measured to confirm the 7-8 degree varus knee.Discussion with the clinical account representative present during the case provided additional insight to the conduction of the case.The surgeon used the plane visualizer tool to initially navigate the tibia cut block before pinning, and then used the saw blade to make the cut.The surgeon did not go back and use the plane visualizer to verify the cut, nor check the cut with the bur in the bur all mode.The patient had severely hard bone due to their wear patterns, making the sawblade more susceptible to bounce in those areas, likely causing the additional varus to the tibia cut.This situation is captured in the risk assessment released at the time of the complaint.The failure mode and associated risk have been anticipated within the risk file and that the documented risk level is still adequate.A review of manufacturing records indicate the software met all specifications upon release into distribution.A complaint history review found similar reports.A review of prior escalation actions was performed and found no actions that are applicable to the scope of the reported complaint.This issue will be continuously monitored through complaint investigation and post market surveillance.Based on the investigation, no containment or corrective actions are recommended at this time.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
REAL INTELLIGENCE CORI
Type of Device
ORTHOPEDIC STEREOTAXIC INSTRUMENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
BLUE BELT TECHNOLOGIES
2905 northwest blvd ste 40
plymouth MN 55441
Manufacturer (Section G)
BLUE BELT TECHNOLOGIES
2905 northwest blvd ste 40
plymouth MN 55441
Manufacturer Contact
holly topping
7000 west william cannon drive
austin, TX 78735
5123913905
MDR Report Key13047259
MDR Text Key283158101
Report Number3010266064-2021-00888
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code OLO
UDI-Device Identifier00885556757420
UDI-Public00885556757420
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K193120
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 08/22/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberROB10024
Device Catalogue NumberROB10024
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 11/30/2021
Initial Date FDA Received12/20/2021
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received08/19/2022
Supplement Dates FDA Received08/22/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage A
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-