| Model Number |
1217-01-048 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Device Dislodged or Dislocated (2923); Noise, Audible (3273)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Adhesion(s) (1695); Fall (1848); Hematoma (1884); Pain (1994); Scar Tissue (2060); Discomfort (2330); Joint Laxity (4526)
|
| Date of Event |
01/01/2018
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Patient lawyer is claiming for compensation: patient received hip-tep right side on (b)(6) 2018.After initial surgery the patient suffered pain and underwent multiple treatments and interventions.In addition, noises were apparent.Revision of head and unknown parts on (b)(6) 2019.As per lawyer, the hip head showed high wear.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
(b)(4).If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy synthes joint reconstruction, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, depuy synthes joint reconstruction, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.H10 additional narrative: if information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Medical records received.On may 15, 2018, the patient had infiltration of the sacroiliac joint right, to address acute lumbago on jan 21, 2019, the patient had a revision hip joint to address arthrofibrosis after hip tep right with scarring.There was no mention of the removal of any components.(18.D8.20t8 potentially thought to be 19.08.2019 ) the patient had the diagnosis of inlay subluxation with a joint prosthesis on the right.The inlay was noted to be depuy that was implanted.Prior to surgery, the patient was noted to have had a fall.The medical translation provided was difficult to understand.It appeared that the liner was tilted in the cup and there was wear present on the liner.It is unclear if the same liner was placed back in the patient or if a new liner of the same size was positioned.For the purpose of this review, it will be assumed a new liner was placed.The femoral head was revised and a larger head was placed.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy synthes joint reconstruction, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, depuy synthes joint reconstruction, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).Investigation summary: no device associated with this report was received for examination.The information received will be retained for potential series investigations if triggered by trend analysis, post market surveillance, or other events within the quality system.Depuy considers the investigation closed.Should additional information be received, the information will be reviewed and the investigation will be re-opened as necessary.Device history lot: dhr review for product code - 121701048 / lot - 8493491.The results are: quantity manufactured: (b)(4) pcs.Date of manufacture: 12-mar-2017.Any anomalies or deviations identified in dhr: no.Expiry date: 28-feb-2027.Ifu reference: (b)(4).Due to no similar failures found in the dhr review, the root cause of the complaint cannot be determined.Should further information come available that impacts the findings in this investigation it will be reopened.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).Investigation summary: no device associated with this report was received for examination.The information received will be retained for potential series investigations if triggered by trend analysis, post market surveillance, or other events within the quality system.Depuy considers the investigation closed.Should additional information be received, the information will be reviewed and the investigation will be re-opened as necessary.Device history lot: dhr review for product code - 121701048 / lot - 8493491.The results are - 1) quantity manufactured: (b)(4) pcs, 2) date of manufacture: 12-mar-2017, 3) any anomalies or deviations identified in dhr: no, 4) expiry date: 28-feb-2027, 5) ifu reference: 090200701.Due to no similar failures found in the dhr review, the root cause of the complaint cannot be determined.Should further information come available that impacts the findings in this investigation it will be reopened.E3 initial reporter occupation: lawyer.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|