|
Placement of the device is dictated by the surgeon's preference not by the design of the implant.Images provided by the hospital showed one of the devices to have been placed or migrated too far posteriorly.This led to the decision by the surgeon to surgically intervene in order to position the cage optimally within the disc.There was no intervention at the time of surgery until several weeks later.On a follow up call to the sales consultant on 11/23/2021, the sales consultant reported that the surgeon had removed the cage and replaced it with another one on (b)(6) 2021.Subsequent to the follow up call, expanding innovations inc., received ct scans but could not confirm whether any migration of the cage had occurred post-op.The cage has not been returned to expanding innovations for evaluation.However, review of the device history records show that the cage met all release criteria.
|