• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ANATOMAGE INC. ANATOMAGE GUIDE; SURGICAL GUIDE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ANATOMAGE INC. ANATOMAGE GUIDE; SURGICAL GUIDE Back to Search Results
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problem Failure of Implant (1924)
Event Date 12/07/2021
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Based on our investigation, we can conclude that the guide was fabricated for the incorrect drill length due to an internal error.However, the returned guide passed its trajectory analysis, and the longer drill length should not have contributed to the trajectory deviation.As such, the cause of the deviation could not be determined, and may have been due to complex clinical aspects outside the scope of this investigation.
 
Event Description
The guide was used for implant surgery.The doctor stated that the guide sat well on the dental model and patient.However, it was fabricated for a 21 mm drill instead of for a 15mm drill as he had requested.Additionally, after using the pilot drill, he noticed that the osteotomy was closer to tooth #4 than intended.He decided to trust the guide and proceeded with surgery, but the implant ended up being ~1-1.5mm from the root of tooth #4 which was closer than planned.The implant was removed at a later date, and the doctor grafted the site.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Based on our investigation, we can conclude that the guide was fabricated for the incorrect drill length due to an internal error.However, the returned guide passed its trajectory analysis, and the longer drill length should not have contributed to the trajectory deviation.As such, the cause of the deviation could not be determined, and may have been due to complex clinical aspects outside the scope of this investigation.
 
Event Description
The guide was used for implant surgery.The doctor stated that the guide sat well on the dental model and patient.However, it was fabricated for a 21 mm drill instead of for a 15mm drill as he had requested.Additionally, after using the pilot drill, he noticed that the osteotomy was closer to tooth #4 than intended.He decided to trust the guide and proceeded with surgery, but the implant ended up being ~1-1.5mm from the root of tooth #4 which was closer than planned.The implant was removed at a later date, and the doctor grafted the site.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ANATOMAGE GUIDE
Type of Device
SURGICAL GUIDE
Manufacturer (Section D)
ANATOMAGE INC.
3350 scott blvd. bldg 29
santa clara CA 95054
Manufacturer (Section G)
ANATOMAGE INC.
3350 scott blvd bldg 29
santa clara CA 95054
Manufacturer Contact
tim nguyen
3350 scott blvd. bldg 29
santa clara, CA 95054
4083333484
MDR Report Key13063489
MDR Text Key285615982
Report Number3008272529-2021-00025
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NDP
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 12/22/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/22/2021
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer12/15/2021
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received12/09/2021
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured12/02/2021
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age50 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-