• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SI-BONE, INC. IFUSE IMPLANT SYSTEM; ORTHOPEDIC ROD

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SI-BONE, INC. IFUSE IMPLANT SYSTEM; ORTHOPEDIC ROD Back to Search Results
Model Number 7040M-90
Medical Device Problem Code Malposition of Device (2616)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Arthralgia (2355)
Date of Event 11/30/2021
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Event or Problem Description
The patient had left si joint arthrodesis in (b)(6) 2021 where three implants were installed.The patient complained of pain following the initial procedure.The surgeon determined that the middle and inferior positioned implants were not positioned fully across the si joint.Two weeks after the initial procedure, the surgeon performed a revision where he removed the inferior positioned implants and replaced it with a shorter implant of the same type.He also impacted the second implant further across joint.The preexisting superior positioned implant was not adjusted or removed.The patient's pain symptoms were reduced following the revision procedure.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Based on the information provided, review of the surgical technique manual, ifu, certificates of conformance and fmea, there is no indication of device failure and no indication that the devices were out of specification.The most probable root cause is user error: not installing the implants fully across the si joint.Additionally, per the surgical technique manual, the surgeon is instructed as follows: "prior to closure, always obtain final fluoroscopic images in the lateral, inlet, and outlet views to confirm no cortical wall breach, foramen breach, or other malposition.".
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Based on the information provided, review of the surgical technique manual, ifu, certificates of conformance and fmea, there is no indication of device failure and no indication that the devices were out of specification.The most probable root cause is user error: not installing the implants fully across the si joint.Additionally, per the surgical technique manual, the surgeon is instructed as follows: "prior to closure, always obtain final fluoroscopic images in the lateral, inlet, and outlet views to confirm no cortical wall breach, foramen breach, or other malposition.".
 
Event or Problem Description
The patient had left si joint arthrodesis in (b)(6) 2021 where three implants were installed.The patient complained of pain following the initial procedure.The surgeon determined that the middle and inferior positioned implants were not positioned fully across the si joint.Two weeks after the initial procedure, the surgeon performed a revision where he removed the inferior positioned implants and replaced it with a shorter implant of the same type.He also impacted the second implant further across joint.The preexisting superior positioned implant was not adjusted or removed.The patient's pain symptoms were reduced following the revision procedure.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
IFUSE IMPLANT SYSTEM
Common Device Name
ORTHOPEDIC ROD
Manufacturer (Section D)
SI-BONE, INC.
471 el camino real
suite 101
santa clara CA 95050 4482
Manufacturer (Section G)
SI-BONE, INC.
471 el camino real
suite 101
santa clara CA 95050 4482
Manufacturer Contact
w. reckling, m.d.
471 el camino real
suite 101
santa clara, CA 95050-4482
4082070700
MDR Report Key13064285
Report Number3007700286-2021-00134
Device Sequence Number4256545
Product Code OUR
UDI-Device Identifier00851085007343
UDI-Public00851085007343
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateCA
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K193524
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2021
Device Explanted Year2021
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date (Section B) 12/17/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date12/31/2025
Device Model Number7040M-90
Device Lot Number9033341
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 11/16/2021
Initial Report FDA Received Date12/22/2021
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured12/31/2025
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Other;
Patient Age62 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-