No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges adverse patient outcome associated with the hernia mesh used to treat the patient.The patient's attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.This emdr represents the bard/davol 3dmax (device #1).An additional emdr was submitted to represent the bard/davol ventrio (device #2).Should additional information be provided, a supplemental emdr will be submitted.
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of an unspecified bard/davol 3dmax mesh, ventralight st and ventrio patch on (b)(6) 2013 and/or (b)(6) 2021.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against 3dmax mesh and ventrio patch.Attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention due to the hernia mesh device.It is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.
|