Model Number 3ZZ164275X |
Device Problem
Noise, Audible (3273)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Terumo has not received the device for evaluation; therefore, the investigation has yet to be completed.Terumo plans on submitting a follow-up report when the investigation is complete and when more information becomes available.(b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
The user facility reported to terumo cardiovascular that prior to cardiopulmonary bypass, during prime, they noticed a noisy delphin pump.No known impact or consequence to patient.Product was changed out.Procedure was completed successfully.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This follow-up report is submitted to fda in accord with applicable regulations ¿ and as indicated by terumo cardiovascular systems in the initial report submitted to the fda on november 3, 2021.Upon further investigation of the reported event, the following information is new and/or changed: d4 (additional device information - added expiration date) g3 (date received by manufacturer).G6 (indication that this is a follow-up report).H2 (follow-up due to additional information).H4 (device manufacture date).H6 (identification of evaluation codes 11, 3331, 4114, 170, 25).Type of investigation: #1: 11 - testing of device from same lot/batch retained by manufacturer.Type of investigation #2: 3331 - analysis of production records.Type of investigation #3: 4114 - device not returned.Investigation findings: 170 - manufacturing process problem identified.Investigation conclusions: 23 - manufacturing deficiency.The affected sample was not returned so a thorough investigation could not be conducted.The retention sample was inspected with no visual anomalies noted.The unit was setup in a saline circuit with a sorin drive system with a terumo cp adapter.While pumping with the sorin drive, the pump exhibited no unusual noises.An investigation has been initiated to document and address the investigation and any potential changes required to remedy the failure mode observed.All available information has been placed on file in quality management for appropriate tracking, trending, and follow-up.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This follow-up report is submitted to fda in accord with applicable regulations.Upon further investigation of the reported event, the following information is new and/or changed: d9 (device availability - added date returned to manufacturer); g3 (date received by manufacturer); g6 (indication that this is a follow-up report) ; h2 (follow-up due to additional information) ; h3 (device evaluation anticipated by manufacturer - a second follow-up will be submitted upon completion of the investigation and/or submission of new information, thus tcvs references conclusions code 11.) all available information has been placed on file in quality management for appropriate tracking, trending, and follow-up.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This follow-up report is submitted to fda in accord with applicable regulations.Upon further investigation of the reported event, the following information is new and/or changed: g3 (date received by manufacturer).G6 (indication that this is a follow-up report).H2 (follow-up due to additional information and device evaluation).H3 (device evaluated by manufacturer).H6 (identification of evaluation codes 10, 213, 22).Type of investigation #1: 10 - testing of actual/suspected device.Investigation findings: 213 - no device problem found.Investigation conclusions: 22 - known inherent risk of device.The returned sample was received and visually inspected, no anomaly noted.The sample was built into a saline circuit and set up on a sarns drive motor.The rpm was set at 900 and ramped up by 300 rpm every ten minutes for one hour for a maximum of 2400 rpm.During each interval, the returned sample was observed for any running sound anomalies.No sound anomalies or abnormalities with the functionality were observed during the test.The retention sample was inspected with no visual anomalies noted.The unit was setup in a saline circuit with a sorin drive system with a terumo cp adapter.While pumping with the sorin drive, the pump exhibited no unusual noises.The noise was not able to be replicated on the complaint or retention sample; however, the issue experienced by the customer is likely due to an abnormal interaction between the seal rotor and stator surfaces.All available information has been placed on file in quality management for appropriate tracking, trending, and follow-up.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|