Product complaint # (b)(4).Complainant part is expected to be returned for manufacturer review/investigation but has yet to be received.Reporter is a j&j representative.The investigation could not be completed, no product was received; no conclusion could be drawn at the time of filing this report.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
It was reported that on (b)(6) 2021, the patient underwent for a procedure.The impactor was coming apart during surgery and the depth gauge was bent, there was no surgical delay.The surgery was completed successfully.The patient outcome was unknown.This complaint involves (2) devices.This report is for (1) depth gauge for multiloc humeral nailing system.This report is 1 of 1 for (b)(4).
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If the information is unknown, not available or does not apply, the section/field of the form is left blank.H10 additional narrative: visual inspection: the depth gauge f/ml hum nail was received at juarez pal.Visual examination of the returned device found the distal tip of the returned device is bent.Additionally, scratches were observed on the tip of the depth gauge.The investigation did not identified any other defects.Dimensional inspection: no dimensional inspection was performed due to post-manufacturing damage.Complaint relevant dimensions cannot be taken.Document/specification review: based on the date of manufacture, the current and manufactured revision of drawings were reviewed no design issues or discrepancies were identified.Investigation conclusion: the overall complaint was confirmed for the received device.No definitive root cause could be determined based on the provided information.There was no indication that a design or manufacturing issue contributed to the complaint.No design issues were observed during the document/specification review.Based on the investigation findings, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post market safety surveillance activities.Device history lot - a manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device lot number, and no non-conformances were identified.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|