• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SMITH & NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS LTD FEMORAL HEAD 44MM; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/METAL, RESURFACING

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SMITH & NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS LTD FEMORAL HEAD 44MM; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/METAL, RESURFACING Back to Search Results
Model Number 74123144
Medical Device Problem Code Biocompatibility (2886)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Metal Related Pathology (4530)
Date of Event 11/25/2016
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Internal complaint reference (b)(4).
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that, after left bhr surgery had been performed on (b)(6) 2009, the plaintiff experienced elevated chromium and cobalt levels.Plaintiff underwent a revision surgery on (b)(6) 2018 to treat this adverse event.The current health status of the patient is unknown.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H3, h6: it was reported that a left hip revision surgery was performed.As of today, the implanted devices, all of which were used in treatment, and additional information has been requested for this complaint but has not become available.Since part/lot details were not received for investigation no thorough manufacturing record review can be performed.If the products or additional information become available in the future, the tasks will be reopened and performed.A risk management review was performed.The alleged failure modes and associated risks have been anticipated within the risk file and the anticipated risk level is still adequate.No further actions are required at this time.Based on the reported symptoms it cannot be concluded that the events/clinical reactions (elevated chromium and cobalt levels) were associated with a mal-performance of the implant.The patient impact cannot be determined at this time.Without the return of the devices used in treatment or additional information we cannot advance the investigation or confirm this complaint; our investigation remains inconclusive, and a definitive root cause cannot be determined.Based on the limited information provided we are unable to speculate on specific factors known to contribute to the alleged fault.Should the devices or additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective and preventative actions is not indicated.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Section d1 and d4 were corrected.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H3, h6: it was reported that a left hip revision surgery was performed.As of today, the implanted devices, all of which were used in treatment have not been returned for evaluation.Without a definitive batch number, a complete review of the historical complaints data cannot be performed for the acetabular cup and the femoral head.A review of historical complaints data was performed using part numbers and the reported failure modes to evaluate patterns of repeated failures or defects in a timeframe prior 12 months as of the complaint aware date.Other similar complaints have been identified for the part number and the reported failure mode, however, as the device is no longer sold, no action is to be taken.As no device batch numbers were provided for investigation, manufacturing record review, device labelling / ifu review could not be performed.If more information is received, this investigation will be reopened.A risk management review was performed.The alleged failure modes and associated risks have been anticipated within the risk file and the anticipated risk level is still adequate.No further actions are required at this time.A review of historic escalation actions related to the products and similar complaint events was performed.Following the review, prior applicable escalation actions were identified and confirmed to reduce associated risks as far as possible.No further escalation actions required.The available medical documents were reviewed.Although it was reported that the patient experienced elevated chromium and cobalt levels, the laboratory report or values were not provided for review.Without the supporting laboratory/pathology results imaging, and/or the explant the clinical root cause of the reported elevated chromium and cobalt levels, pain, and intraoperative findings of green/yellow fluid and findings consistent with metallosis cannot be determined.It cannot be concluded that the clinical reactions are associated with a mal-performance of the implant.The patient impact beyond the pain and revision cannot be determined.Based on the available information we can confirm the reported complaint, however without further information our investigation remains inconclusive, and a definitive root cause cannot be determined.Specific factors known to contribute to the alleged fault are excessive physical activity levels, unreasonable stress on replacement system, excessive patient weight, trauma to the joint replacement, loosening of components may increase production of wear particles and accelerate damage to the bone.Should the devices or additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective and preventative actions is not indicated.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H10: additional information in b3, b6, and b7.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H10.Additional information in d9: other applicable escalation actions identified: fda recall reference - z-2267-2018 & z-2268-2018; fda recall - z-2745-2015 through z-2747-2015.It was reported that a left hip revision surgery was performed after the patient experienced elevated metal ion levels.As of today, the implanted devices, all of which were used in treatment have not been returned for evaluation.Without a definitive batch number, a complete review of the historical complaints data cannot be performed.A review of historical complaints data was performed using part numbers and the reported failure modes to evaluate patterns of repeated failures or defects in a timeframe prior 12 months as of the complaint aware date.Other similar complaints have been identified for the part number and the reported failure mode; this will continue to be monitored via routine trending, however it should be noted that the device is no longer sold.As no device batch numbers were provided for investigation, a manufacturing record review could not be performed.If more information is received, this investigation will be reopened.The review of the product ifu at the time of implantation found adequate warnings and precautions in relation to the alleged failure modes.A risk management review was performed.The alleged failure modes and associated risks have been anticipated within the risk file and the anticipated risk level is still adequate.No further actions are required at this time.A review of historic escalation actions related to the products and similar complaint events was performed.Following the review, prior applicable escalation actions were identified and confirmed to reduce associated risks as far as possible.No further escalation actions required.The available clinical / medical information was reviewed.The reported pain, elevated cobalt and chromium levels along with the intraoperative findings of green/yellow fluid and findings consistent with metallosis in the tissue surrounding the hip and femoral neck may be consistent with findings associated with metal debris; however the clinical root cause cannot be determined based on the information provided.It cannot be concluded that the clinical reactions are associated with a mal-performance of the implant.The patient impact beyond the pain and revision cannot be determined.Based on the available information our investigation remains inconclusive, and a definitive root cause cannot be determined.Specific factors known to contribute to the alleged fault are excessive physical activity levels, unreasonable stress on replacement system, excessive patient weight, trauma to the joint replacement, loosening of components may increase production of wear particles and accelerate damage to the bone.Should the devices or additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective and preventative actions is not indicated.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
FEMORAL HEAD 44MM
Common Device Name
PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/METAL, RESURFACING
Manufacturer (Section D)
SMITH & NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS LTD
aurora house, spa park
leamington spa warwickshire CV31 3HL
UK  CV31 3HL
Manufacturer (Section G)
SMITH & NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS LTD
aurora house, spa park
leamington spa warwickshire CV31 3HL
UK   CV31 3HL
Manufacturer Contact
holly topping
7000 west william cannon drive
austin, TX 78735
5123913905
MDR Report Key13087697
Report Number3005975929-2021-00582
Device Sequence Number5710879
Product Code NXT
UDI-Device Identifier03596010552419
UDI-Public03596010552419
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateIL
Initial Reporter CountryUS
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2009
Device Explanted Year2018
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Other
Remedial Action Recall
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 06/15/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model Number74123144
Device Catalogue Number74123144
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 12/06/2021
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer02/06/2022
05/12/2022
07/26/2022
05/11/2022
06/14/2023
Initial Report FDA Received Date12/27/2021
Supplement Report FDA Received Date02/07/2022
05/16/2022
07/29/2022
05/16/2023
06/15/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
If action reported to FDA under 21 USC 360i(g), list
FDA-assigned Recall Number or include a statement
Z-2267-2018
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexMale
-
-