The reported event could be confirmed, since an x-ray was provided showing the broken nail.The device was not returned and therefore a product inspection could not be performed.Since one x-ray was provided, the opinion of a medical expert was requested.Their statement is as follows when asked if it was possible to determine any factor that could have contributed to the breakage: " it is clear, that a non-union occurred, here.One reason might be the fracture pattern with a major fragment dislocation of the lesser trochanter-this leads to a medial instability and may have contributed to the failure.A surgical measurement would have been the restoration of the anatomy with an additional cerclage to reduce the gap and provide more stability.Additionally, the patient's advanced age and low bmi may favor a metabolic cause for the observed difficulties.The medical expert also stated "that since only one x-ray was available an assessment is only possible to a very limited extent and misinterpretations can occur much more easily'.More information is required for a full analysis.Based on the information available, the root cause can at least partially be attributed to a patient related issue.The failure was caused by the fracture pattern, as well as the patient's conditions related to their age and bmi.A review of the device history for the reported lot did not indicate any abnormalities.No corrective actions are required at this time.A review of the labeling did not indicate any abnormalities.No indications of material, manufacturing or design related problems were found during the investigation.If the device is returned or if any additional information is provided, the investigation will be reassessed.
|