SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. TWINFIX ULTRA PK 4.5MM W/2 UB -WHT &BL; FASTENER, FIXATION, NONDEGRADABLE, SOFT TISSUE
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number 72202595 |
Device Problem
Corroded (1131)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 12/01/2021 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Internal complaint reference: (b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during an arthroscopy, inside of the patient, there was rust between the nail body and metal rod of the twinfix.The procedure was successfully completed with 30 minutes of delay, after pulling it out, and fix it again with 5.5 external anchor.No other complications were reported.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during an arthroscopy, inside of the patient, there was rust between the nail body and metal rod of the twinfix.The procedure was successfully completed with a 30 minutes delay, after pulling the anchor out, and fix it again with a 5.5 external anchor.No other complications were reported.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H2: additional information ¿b5, e1¿.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Internal complaint reference (b)(4).H10 h3, h6: the reported device was received for evaluation.It was determined the device contributed to the reported event.A complaint history review concluded this was a repeat issue.A review of device records showed there were no indications to suggest that the product did not meet manufacturing specification upon release for distribution.The instructions for use was reviewed and found to include conditions of off label use and technique specifics, as well as precautions and warnings related to the use of the device.A risk management review found that the reported failure was documented appropriately, and there were no indications to suggest the anticipated risk is not adequate.A review of the part drawing found that a design change was implemented as part of a corrective action to preserve the quality of the device.The shaft is visually inspected for deformities, and a certificate of conformance for evidence of passivation is required.A review of the customer provided image found an arthroscopic view of the device in use.There is a brown discoloration on the laser marking of the device, but the substance cannot be identified in the image.A visual inspection of the returned device found that it is not in its original packaging.The anchor and sutures were not received with the device.There are no signs of corrosion on the device.There is biological debris on the shaft.The discoloration seen in the customer provided image cannot be seen on the device.The biocompatibility of the color variation material is unknown, and the possibility of localized pain/discomfort, cannot be ruled out if the material or residue from the reported ¿rust¿ remains in the patient.This is presumed to be unlikely with intraoperative surgical awareness and standard irrigation of arthroscopic procedures, but removal is not documented.No further medical assessment can be rendered at this time.The complaint was confirmed, and the root cause was associated with device design.A corrective action for this failure mode is in place.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|