• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AMO MANUFACTURING NETHERLANDS TECNIS SYNERGY TORIC II; LENS, MULTIFOCAL INTRAOCULAR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AMO MANUFACTURING NETHERLANDS TECNIS SYNERGY TORIC II; LENS, MULTIFOCAL INTRAOCULAR Back to Search Results
Model Number DFW150
Medical Device Problem Code Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Visual Disturbances (2140); Halo (2227)
Date of Event 09/23/2021
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Weight: unknown/ not provided.The device is not received; therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.A review of the device/lot history record and complaint trending for this device will be performed.Upon completion of the review, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch will be filed.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that an intraocular lens (iol) was explanted from the patient's left eye due to patient not liking halos and glare-photopsia.Visual issues occurred 1 day post implant.There was an incision enlargement.The iol was replaced with a different lens model and diopter (19.0d).Patient is happy with 20/20 visual acuity.No other information was provided.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Section d9.Device available for evaluation? yes.Returned to manufacturer on: jan 8, 2022.Section h3.Device evaluated manufacturer? yes.Device evaluation: visual inspection under magnification revealed viscoelastic residue on the optic body and haptic and that the lens was received cut in half.Based on the return condition of the lens, no further product evaluation could be performed on the lens.The complaint issue could not be confirmed, and no product deficiency could be identified.Manufacturing record review: the manufacturing process record was evaluated and revealed that the product was manufactured and released according to specifications.A search revealed that no additional complaints were received from this production order.Conclusion: as a result of the investigation there is no indication of a product quality deficiency and the reported issue could not be verified.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TECNIS SYNERGY TORIC II
Common Device Name
LENS, MULTIFOCAL INTRAOCULAR
Manufacturer (Section D)
AMO MANUFACTURING NETHERLANDS
van swietenlaan 5
groningen, groningen 9728 NX
NL  9728 NX
Manufacturer Contact
somyata nagpal
31 technology drive
irvine, CA 92618
7142478552
MDR Report Key13114537
Report Number3012236936-2021-00186
Device Sequence Number3693663
Product Code MFK
UDI-Device Identifier05050474751224
UDI-Public(01)05050474751224(17)240413
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateWA
Initial Reporter CountryUS
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2021
Device Explanted Year2021
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,User Facility
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 02/15/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date04/13/2024
Device Model NumberDFW150
Device Catalogue NumberDFW150U180
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer02/08/2022
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 12/01/2021
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer02/15/2022
Initial Report FDA Received Date12/29/2021
Supplement Report FDA Received Date02/15/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured04/13/2021
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient SexMale
Patient RaceWhite
-
-