• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES EDWARDS SAPIEN 3 TRANSCATHETER HEART VALVE; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES EDWARDS SAPIEN 3 TRANSCATHETER HEART VALVE; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED Back to Search Results
Model Number 9600TFX29
Device Problem Perivalvular Leak (1457)
Patient Problem Heart Failure/Congestive Heart Failure (4446)
Event Date 09/30/2019
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
As reported by our affiliates in (b)(6), through the review of the clinical case: "valve-in-ring transcatheter heart valve for severe tricuspid regurgitation", corresponding author dr.(b)(6) from (b)(6) hospital.Case of a (b)(6) man who was experiencing decompensations of right-sided heart failure 1 year after undergoing valve annuloplasty with a 34-mm carpentier-edwards mc3 band due to severe tricuspid regurgitation with right-sided heart failure.Two months after the surgical repair, severe tricuspid regurgitation had returned and the patient required prolonged hospital admissions.At time of presentation the patient was deemed to be unfit for further surgical intervention and they decided to perform a transcatheter alternative.The valve-in-ring procedure was performed by transfemoral approach with a 29 mm sapien 3 that was slowly deployed across the tricuspid annuloplasty ring.After deployment, right ventriculography and transesophageal echocardiography revealed significant valvular and paravalvular tricuspid regurgitation.The cause of valvular regurgitation was entrapment of 1 leaflet of the sapien 3, which could not be freed by simple wire or catheter manipulation.As a consequence, a second 29-mm sapien 3 thv was implanted in a more ventricular position to overcome the leaflet entrapment.Transesophageal echocardiography confirmed resolution of tricuspid regurgitation, but moderate pvl persisted.No actions were performed during the index procedure.6 weeks post-procedure demonstrated pvl and the patient was readmitted to the hospital due to right-sided heart failure, which mandated pvl closure.For the treatment of pvl, the doctors used a total of 4 amplatzer vascular plugiii.Trans-esophageal echocardiography demonstrated only trivial pvl.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Please reference related manufacturer report no: 2015691-2018-02912 for the report related to the valve in valve procedure.The dates of the event is unknown; however, the article was submitted for publication on september 30, 2019.Therefore, the 'submission for publication date' was used as the occurrence date.The edwards sapien 3 transcatheter heart valve is indicated for patients with severe symptomatic calcified native aortic/mitral valve stenosis.Deployment of the sapien 3 valve in a sapien 3 a the tricuspid ring is not indicated per the labeling; therefore the labeling (ifus and ew training manuals) do not instruct the operator how to position the sapien 3 valve in this scenario.Per the instructions for use (ifu), paravalvular leak (pvl) is a known potential adverse event associated with bioprosthetic heart valves.Paravalvular leak refers to blood flowing through a channel between the structure of the implanted valve and the cardiac tissue, as a result of a lack of appropriate sealing of the valve to the target site.Some pvl is not uncommon post-deployment.Many cases are mild to moderate, and either resolve over time or do not cause symptoms.Others may be more clinically significant and require intervention.The mechanism behind worsening or late pvl is not well understood but may be related to cardiac remodeling.In this case, there was no allegation or indication a product malfunction contributed to this adverse event.Investigation results are inconclusive, however it could be related to the initial placement of the sapien 3 in the tricuspid ring in the tricuspid position.A review of edwards lifesciences risk management documentation was performed for this case.The reported event is an anticipated risk of the transcatheter heart valve procedure, additional assessment of this adverse event is not required at this time.The ifu and training manuals have been reviewed and no inadequacies have been identified with regards to warnings, contraindications, and the directions/conditions for the successful use of the device.Complaint histories for all reported events are reviewed against trending control limits monthly, and any excursions above the control limits are assessed and documented as part of this monthly review.No corrective or preventative actions are required.Valve remains implanted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EDWARDS SAPIEN 3 TRANSCATHETER HEART VALVE
Type of Device
AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED
Manufacturer (Section D)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer (Section G)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer Contact
renee van dorne
1 edwards way
irvine, CA 92614
9492506385
MDR Report Key13119648
MDR Text Key287031638
Report Number2015691-2021-07118
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NPT
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeAS
PMA/PMN Number
P140031
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Literature,Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 12/30/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/30/2021
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Model Number9600TFX29
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received12/10/2021
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age74 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-