• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CORCYM S.R.L. PERCEVAL SUTURELESS AORTIC HEART VALVE; TISSUE HEART VALVE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CORCYM S.R.L. PERCEVAL SUTURELESS AORTIC HEART VALVE; TISSUE HEART VALVE Back to Search Results
Model Number PVS21
Medical Device Problem Code Degraded (1153)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Aortic Valve Stenosis (1717); Heart Failure/Congestive Heart Failure (4446); Aortic Valve Insufficiency/ Regurgitation (4450)
Date of Event 11/18/2021
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Event or Problem Description
On (b)(6) 2016, a perceval valve pvs21 was implanted.On (b)(6) 2021, the patient was hospitalized for left cardiac decompensation with discovery of degeneration of the perceval bioprosthesis.On (b)(6) 2021, the cardiac ultrasound showed degeneration of the perceval valve.A tavi was scheduled on (b)(6) 2021 to treat the patient.
 
Event or Problem Description
On (b)(6) 2016, a percival valve pvs21 was implanted.On (b)(6) 2021, the patient was hospitalized for left cardiac decompensation with discovery of degeneration of the percival bioprosthesis.On (b)(6) 2021, the cardiac ultrasound showed degeneration of the perceval valve.A tavi was scheduled on (b)(6) 2021 to treat the patient.Based on additional information received, the preoperative echo (performed in (b)(6) 2016) showed presence of calcifications in the native aortic valve (mean gradient = 80mhg).The postoperative ultrasound showed preserved lvef, moderate lv hypertrophy (detected also pre-operatively) and a mean transaortic gradient of 17mmhg.The echo performed on (b)(6) 2021 before the reoperation confirmed the degeneration of the perceval valve prosthesis resulting in aortic stenosis (mean gradient 69mmhg) and moderate to medium regurgitation.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Fields updated: a complete manufacturing and material records review for the device has been performed.The results confirmed that the device satisfied all material, visual and performance standards required at the time of manufacture and release.Since the device was not explanted, no further investigation is possible at this time.Based on the information available, it is not possible to establish a definitive root cause for the reported event.As reported in the scientific literature, structural valve deterioration is the major cause of failure of bioprosthetic heart valves.It is possible that the patient¿s clinical history and risk factors may have contributed to the structural valve deterioration observed in this percival valve.However, little clinical history was provided for this patient, and this cannot be definitively stated.Ultimately, since no device investigation is possible, the root cause cannot be established at this time.It should be noted that structural valve deterioration is listed as a possible adverse event in the percival valve ifu.The event is, therefore, a known inherent risk of the device.Should any further information be received in the future, the manufacturer will provide an update to this reporting activity.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PERCEVAL SUTURELESS AORTIC HEART VALVE
Common Device Name
TISSUE HEART VALVE
Manufacturer (Section D)
CORCYM S.R.L.
strada crescentino
saluggia
Manufacturer (Section G)
CORCYM S.R.L.
strada crescentino
saluggia, vercelli
Manufacturer Contact
francesca crovato
5005 north fraser way
burnaby, bc 
MDR Report Key13125063
Report Number3005687633-2021-00170
Device Sequence Number4465086
Product Code LWR
UDI-Device Identifier08022057014696
UDI-Public(01)08022057014696(240)ICV1208(17)200314
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P150011
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2016
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 01/31/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date03/14/2020
Device Model NumberPVS21
Device Catalogue NumberICV1208
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 12/02/2021
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer01/03/2022
Initial Report FDA Received Date12/31/2021
Supplement Report FDA Received Date01/31/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured03/15/2016
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age78 YR
Patient SexUnknown
Patient Weight62 KG
-
-