• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. NS VIS ADPT GUIDE LGNP KIT; PROSTHESIS,KNEE,PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL,SEMICONSTRAINED,CEMENTED,POLYMERMETALPOLYMER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. NS VIS ADPT GUIDE LGNP KIT; PROSTHESIS,KNEE,PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL,SEMICONSTRAINED,CEMENTED,POLYMERMETALPOLYMER Back to Search Results
Model Number V0200109
Medical Device Problem Code Positioning Failure (1158)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 11/16/2021
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Internal complaint reference (b)(4).
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that, during a tka surgery, a cutting block from a visionaire adaptive guide kit legion primary did not fit perfectly.It was poorly supported in the antero-internal area, or if this one was well supported, the block did not fit distally to the condyles.The best possible fit resulted in pin placement with too much external rotation.After the distal cut was performed, it was immediately obvious that something was wrong.It is unknown if this issue caused any surgical delay; however, the procedure was completed with the same device.The current health status of patient is unknown.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that, during a tka surgery, a cutting block from a visionaire adaptive guide kit legion primary did not fit perfectly.It was poorly supported in the antero-internal area, or if this one was well supported, the block did not fit distally to the condyles.The best possible fit resulted in pin placement with too much external rotation.After the distal cut was performed, it was immediately obvious that something was wrong on the rotation of the femur cutting block.The procedure was completed with a non-significant delay, using the same device.However, the surgeon had to re-align with conventional instruments, and a third pin had to be used.The current health status of patient is unknown.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The device was not returned for evaluation but the pictures were reviewed, and they confirm that the device did not fit as intended in the patient.The clinical/medical investigation concluded that, without the requested clinically relevant information, the root cause of the reported ¿cutting block did not fit perfectly¿ cannot be definitively concluded.The patient impact beyond the reported events cannot be determined and the patient¿s current health status remains unknown.The surgery was reportedly completed with the same device with a 0-30-minute surgical extension, and then re-aligned with conventional instruments and a third pin used.No further medical assessment can be rendered.A review of the manufacturing records did not reveal a manufacturing abnormality that could have caused or contributed to the reported incident.A review of the risk management file revealed this failure mode was previously identified.The anticipated risk level is still adequate.A historical review concluded that there are no prior actions related to this product and event.An engineering evaluation was performed and determined that a probable root cause for the reported event could be failure to segment correctly the femur.At this time, we do have reason to suspect that the product failed to meet product specifications at the time of manufacture.Possible causes could include but not limited to surgical technique used, user/procedural variance or segmentation errors.The contribution of the device to the reported event could be corroborated since it didn't perform as expected and the surgeon had to re-align with conventional instruments.This issue was evaluated through our internal quality process and based on a risk assessment, determined that the need for corrective actions is not indicated.Should the device or additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however, we will continue to monitor for future complaints and investigate as necessary.We consider this investigation closed.Internal complaint reference number: (b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
NS VIS ADPT GUIDE LGNP KIT
Common Device Name
PROSTHESIS,KNEE,PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL,SEMICONSTRAINED,CEMENTED,POLYMERMETALPOLYMER
Manufacturer (Section D)
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.
1450 brooks rd.
memphis TN 38116
Manufacturer (Section G)
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.
1450 brooks rd.
memphis TN 38116
Manufacturer Contact
holly topping
7000 west william cannon drive
austin, TX 78735
5123913905
MDR Report Key13142410
Report Number1020279-2022-00011
Device Sequence Number4651714
Product Code JWH
UDI-Device Identifier00885556656563
UDI-Public00885556656563
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryPO
PMA/510(K) Number
K170282
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 07/22/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date04/20/2022
Device Model NumberV0200109
Device Catalogue NumberV0200109
Device Lot Number00218746V1
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 12/14/2021
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer01/03/2022
07/12/2022
Initial Report FDA Received Date01/03/2022
Supplement Report FDA Received Date01/04/2022
07/22/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) No
Date Device Manufactured10/22/2021
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device A
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient SexFemale
-
-