• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SARL 132CM EMBOVAC 71 ASP. CATHETER; EMBOVAC ASPIRATION CATHETER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SARL 132CM EMBOVAC 71 ASP. CATHETER; EMBOVAC ASPIRATION CATHETER Back to Search Results
Catalog Number IC71132CA
Device Problems Break (1069); Difficult to Remove (1528)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 12/10/2021
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
The healthcare professional reported that during a thrombectomy procedure, a132cm embovac 71 aspiration catheter (ic71132ca / 30578753) was damaged during the procedure targeting an occlusion located on the left m1 segment in an (b)(4) female patient.It was reported that once the embovac was positioned at the m1 origin where the clot was located, the guiding catheter was in the internal carotid artery (ica) curve.While retrieving the embovac in aspiration in order to remove the clot, the interaction between the embovac and the neuron max® 088 sheath (penumbra) caused the embovac damage.This generated high friction and difficulties in retrieving the embovac.In order to remove it, both the neuronmax and the embovac were retrieved.There was a 7-minute delay to the procedure but the procedure was successfully completed.There was no report of any patient adverse event or complication.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Manufacturer¿s ref.No: (b)(4).Information regarding patient identifier, date of birth, weight, race, and ethnicity were not provided.The initial reporter phone is not available / reported.The device is available to be returned for evaluation and testing.However, it has not been received to date as indicated as ¿other¿ in this section as the reason for non-evaluation.If the device returns, a device investigation will be performed.A review of manufacturing documentation associated with this lot (30578753) presented no issues during the manufacturing or inspection processes related to the reported complaint.There were no nonconformances related to device manufacture or inspection.All product rejected during manufacturing was identified as scrap and properly accounted for.Missing information from this report is identified as blank; this information was not provided in the reported event or available at the time of report submission.The manufacturer will submit a supplemental report if new facts arise which materially alter information submitted in a previous mdr report.Additional information will be submitted within 30 days of receipt.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Manufacturer¿s ref.No: (b)(4).The purpose of this mdr submission is to include the additional event information received on 11-jan-2022, and to report that multiple attempts to obtain product for analysis were unsuccessful.If product is returned or information provided at a later date, the file will be updated accordingly.[conclusion]: the healthcare professional reported that during a thrombectomy procedure, a132cm embovac 71 aspiration catheter (ic71132ca / 30578753) was damaged during the procedure targeting an occlusion located on the left m1 segment in an 84-year-old female patient.It was reported that once the embovac was positioned at the m1 origin where the clot was located, the guiding catheter was in the internal carotid artery (ica) curve.While retrieving the embovac in aspiration in order to remove the clot, the interaction between the embovac and the neuron max® 088 sheath (penumbra) caused the embovac damage.This generated high friction and difficulties in retrieving the embovac.In order to remove it, both the neuronmax and the embovac were retrieved.There was a 7-minute delay to the procedure but the procedure was successfully completed.There was no report of any patient adverse event or complication.On 11-jan-2022, additional information was received.The information indicated that the vessels were not excessively tortuous nor presented acute bends.The procedure was an adapt (direct aspiration first pass technique) case.The device was not snaked (advanced without wire / microcatheter); the device was advanced with an axs offset catheter (stryker) and a synchro® 0.014¿ guidewire (stryker).Continuous flush was maintained.There was no resistance / friction when the embovac was initially introduced into the neuron max; the information indicated that the neuron max was used as a guiding catheter.It was reported that once the embovac was positioned at the m1 origin, where the clot was located, the long sheath introducer (neuronmax 0.088¿ 100cm) was in the internal carotid artery (ica) curve.While retrieving the embovac in aspiration in order to remove the clot, the interaction between the embovac and the neuron max caused the embovac damage.The information indicated that ¿it seems the neuron max has cut the embovac.¿ due to the damaged embovac, high friction was generated making difficult to remove the retrieve the embovac.In order to remove the embovac, both the neuron max and the embovac were retrieved.Based on complaint information, the device is not available to be returned for analysis.A review of manufacturing documentation associated with this lot (30578753) presented no issues during the manufacturing or inspection processes related to the reported complaint.There were no nonconformances related to device manufacture or inspection.All product rejected during manufacturing was identified as scrap and properly accounted for.Product analysis cannot be conducted as the product was not returned for analysis.No determination of causes and possible contributing factors could be made.As such, the investigation will be closed.With the information available and without the product available for analysis, the reported customer complaint could not be confirmed.Assignment of root cause for the event remains speculative and inconclusive, based on the information provided and without the return of the complaint sample; however, it is possible that clinical and procedural factors, including device manipulation / interaction, aneurysm size / vessel characteristics, device selection, and the concomitant microcatheter, may have contributed to the reported issue.Based on the manufacturing documentation review, there is no indication that the event is related to the device manufacturing process.As part of the post market surveillance program, information from this complaint is trended for statistical signals and corrective / preventive action may be triggered at a later time.Since there was no evidence to suggest the event was related to a manufacturing or design issue, no corrective actions will be taken at this time.The manufacturer will submit a supplemental report if new facts arise which materially alter information submitted in a previous mdr report.Additional information will be submitted within 30 days of receipt.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Manufacturer¿s ref.No: (b)(4).The purpose of this mdr submission is to include the additional event information received on 02-feb-2022.On 02-feb-2022, additional / clarification information was received indicating that the event reported in medwatch 3500a report: 3008114965-2021-00745 (manufacturer¿s ref.No:(b)(4) belongs to the event reported in medwatch 3500a report: 3008114965-2021-00665 (manufacturer¿s ref.No: (b)(4).All forthcoming additional information will be documented and reported under medwatch 3500a report: 3008114965-2021-00665 (manufacturer¿s ref.No:(b)(4).Updated sections: b.4, g.3, g.6, h.2, and h.10.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
132CM EMBOVAC 71 ASP. CATHETER
Type of Device
EMBOVAC ASPIRATION CATHETER
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SARL
chemin-blanc 38
le locle neuchatel CH-24 00
SZ  CH-2400
Manufacturer (Section G)
CODMAN AND SHURTLEFF, INC (MIRAMAR)
3260 executive way
miramar FL 33025
Manufacturer Contact
gabriel alfageme
31 technology dr
irvine, CA 92618
949789-868
MDR Report Key13144483
MDR Text Key290557592
Report Number3008114965-2021-00745
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NRY
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeIT
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 02/03/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received01/03/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date10/31/2022
Device Catalogue NumberIC71132CA
Device Lot Number30578753
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received02/02/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured05/14/2021
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
AXS OFFSET CATHETER (STRYKER); NEURON MAX® 088 SHEATH (PENUMBRA); SYNCHRO® 0.014¿ GUIDEWIRE (STRYKER)
Patient Age84 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-