• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MAQUET SAS VOLISTA STANDOP; LAMP, SURGICAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MAQUET SAS VOLISTA STANDOP; LAMP, SURGICAL Back to Search Results
Model Number ARD568821962
Device Problem Peeled/Delaminated (1454)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 12/10/2021
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information will be provided following the conclusion of the investigation.Device not returned to manufacturer.
 
Event Description
On (b)(6) 2021 getinge became aware of an issue with one of the surgical lights - volista.It was stated that during surgery paint was peeling from fork and fell into sterile field.We decided to report the issue in abundance of caution as any paint particles falling off into sterile field or during procedure may cause contamination.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The correction of d4 catalog # deems required.This is based on the internal evaluation.Previous d4 catalog # ard568821962.Corrected d4 catalog # ard56821962.Getinge became aware of an issue with volista standop surgical light.It was stated by the customer¿s clinical staff that during surgery paint peeled from fork and fell into sterile field.We decided to report the issue in abundance of caution as any paint particles falling off into sterile field or during procedure may cause contamination.Based on the information collected, it was established that when the event occurred, the surgical light did not meet its specification, since appearance of paint peeling could be considered as technical deficiency, and in this way devices contributed to event.Claimed device was used for patient treatment when the event took place.When reviewing reportable events for this type of issues we were able to establish that the received incident is occurring at a low ratio.The peeling paint was caused by a lack of paint adhesion due to the painting process, the surface was too smooth after nitrocarburizing and the paint did not adhere correctly.The surface treatment of the axle involved was performed, by: manual mechanical cleaning with sanding sponge carborundom p240.In order to improve the paint adhesion, the supplier ¿larm a.S.¿ implemented modifications in the technological process for the metal surface treatment before painting; since february 2020, s70 abrasive ball blasting is applied, increasing the roughness of the surface and ensuring paint adhesion.This step is an automatic process reducing human factor.To prevent any safety issue the user manual ifu 01781 en 13 page 37 mentions to check for any chipped or missing paint during daily inspection.Additional inspection shall be performed as a part of the maintenance monthly inspection (§ 8.1.1 of the user manual ifu 01781 en 13 page 94).
 
Event Description
Manufacturer reference number: (b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The correction of additional mfg narrative/corr.Data# field deem required.This is based on the internal evaluation.#h10 previous additional mfg narrative/corr.Data: getinge became aware of an issue with volista standop surgical light.It was stated by the customer¿s clinical staff that during surgery paint peeled from fork and fell into sterile field.We decided to report the issue in abundance of caution as any paint particles falling off into sterile field or during procedure may cause contamination.Based on the information collected, it was established that when the event occurred, the surgical light did not meet its specification, since appearance of paint peeling could be considered as technical deficiency, and in this way devices contributed to event.Claimed device was used for patient treatment when the event took place.When reviewing reportable events for this type of issues we were able to establish that the received incident is occurring at a low ratio.The peeling paint was caused by a lack of paint adhesion due to the painting process, the surface was too smooth after nitrocarburizing and the paint did not adhere correctly.The surface treatment of the axle involved was performed, by: manual mechanical cleaning with sanding sponge carborundom p240.In order to improve the paint adhesion, the supplier ¿(b)(4)¿ implemented modifications in the technological process for the metal surface treatment before painting; since february 2020, s70 abrasive ball blasting is applied, increasing the roughness of the surface and ensuring paint adhesion.This step is an automatic process reducing human factor.To prevent any safety issue the user manual ifu 01781 en 13 page 37 mentions to check for any chipped or missing paint during daily inspection.Additional inspection shall be performed as a part of the maintenance monthly inspection (§ 8.1.1 of the user manual ifu 01781 en 13 page 94).Corrected additional mfg narrative/corr.Data: getinge became aware of an issue with volista standop surgical light.It was stated by the customer¿s clinical staff that during surgery paint peeled from fork and fell into sterile field.We decided to report the issue in abundance of caution as any paint particles falling off into sterile field or during procedure may cause contamination.Based on information provided by the getinge technician, the issue was solved on warranty terms.As a result, replacement parts were delivered to the customer.Based on the information collected, it was established that when the event occurred, the surgical light did not meet its specification, since appearance of paint peeling could be considered as technical deficiency, and in this way devices contributed to event.Claimed device was used for patient treatment when the event took place.When reviewing reportable events for this type of issues we were able to establish that the received incident is occurring at a low ratio.As stated by the subject matter expert at manufacturer¿s, the peeling paint was caused by a lack of paint adhesion due to the painting process, the surface was too smooth after nitrocarburizing and the paint did not adhere correctly.The surface treatment of the axle involved was performed, by: manual mechanical cleaning with sanding sponge carborundom p240.In order to improve the paint adhesion, the supplier ¿(b)(4).¿ implemented modifications in the technological process for the metal surface treatment before painting; since february 2020, s70 abrasive ball blasting is applied, increasing the roughness of the surface and ensuring paint adhesion.This step is an automatic process reducing human factor.To prevent any safety issue the user manual mentions to check for any chipped or missing paint during daily inspection.Additional inspection shall be performed as a part of the maintenance monthly inspection.Getinge initiated a field action msa-605552 (z-1308-2022) in may 2022 for the volista standop surgical lights due to the potential for paint chipping to occur on the component (reference (b)(4)) located on the fork of the volista standop cupolas.Field action was launched in order to continue to perform daily inspections per the ifu by the customers, which include checking for any chipped or missing paint.If customer observes paint chipping or detachment, getinge recommends to stop using the device and contact getinge service representative to schedule an appointment to replace the part free of charge.Getinge shall continue to monitor for any further events of this nature and do not propose any further action at this time.
 
Event Description
Manufacturer reference number (b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
VOLISTA STANDOP
Type of Device
LAMP, SURGICAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
MAQUET SAS
parc de limere
avenue de la pomme de pin
ardon
Manufacturer (Section G)
MAQUET SAS
parc de limere
avenue de la pomme de pin
ardon
Manufacturer Contact
pascal jay
parc de limere
avenue de la pomme de pin
ardon 
MDR Report Key13150547
MDR Text Key283138861
Report Number9710055-2022-00002
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FTD
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeBR
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Remedial Action Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 01/27/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Model NumberARD568821962
Device Catalogue NumberARD56821962
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 12/16/2021
Initial Date FDA Received01/04/2022
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received01/12/2022
06/30/2022
Supplement Dates FDA Received01/27/2022
07/29/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No
Date Device Manufactured03/22/2017
Is the Device Single Use? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Removal/Correction NumberZ-1308-2022
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-