Pending confirmation of device revision and potential device return.A review of the device history record, which includes verification of all steps in the manufacturing of the catheter kit and sub assembly, verification of all final testing performed by/on the catheter kit and sub assembly, verification of sterilization, and packaging for subject catheter kit and sub assembly was performed.The review did not identify any non-conformances, issues or capas associated with catheter kit and sub assembly function.Device remains implanted at this time and was not returned.Physician did not speculate as to why or how the catheter could have migrated.Per the instructions for use of the device, catheter migration is a known possible risk of use of the device.Internal complaint number: (b)(4).
|
Representative reported that a catheter revision was planned due to a dye study confirming that the catheter had migrated.It was confirmed that the catheter dye study was unsuccessful.No dye was injected, but it was confirmed that the tip of the catheter was at l4, when it was previously placed in the thoracic space.The patient had complained of increased pain.The physician did not speculate as to why or how the catheter could have migrated.
|