• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ETHICON INC. BLAKE DRAIN UNKNOWN PRODUCT; CATHETER, IRRIGATION

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ETHICON INC. BLAKE DRAIN UNKNOWN PRODUCT; CATHETER, IRRIGATION Back to Search Results
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Unspecified Infection (1930); Impaired Healing (2378)
Event Date 02/26/2021
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Product complaint # (b)(4).(b)(4).Reported condition not returned.Additional information has been requested however not received to date.If further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.Were the cases discussed in this article previously reported to ethicon? if yes, please provide a complaint reference number.Does the surgeon believe that ethicon products involved: unknown blake drain caused and/or contributed to the post-operative complications (infection, wound healing complication) described in the article? does the surgeon believe there was any deficiency with the ethicon products: unknown blake drain used in this procedure? this report is related to a journal article; therefore, no product will be returned for analysis and the batch history records cannot be reviewed as the lot number has not been provided.The single complaint was reported with multiple events.There are no additional details regarding the additional events.Citation: journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery, volume 74, pages 2565¿2572; doi: https://doi.Org/10.1016/j.Bjps.2021.02.005.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
 
Event Description
Title: reduction of seroma and improvement of quality of life after early drain removal in immediate breast reconstruction with tissue expander.Preliminary report from a randomized controlled study the goal of this randomized controlled trial was to compare early drain removal with output-based drain removal in patients who underwent mastectomy and immediate reconstruction with a tissue expander.Between september 2016 and march 2018, 49 patients who underwent mastectomy and breast reconstruction were included in the study.The patients were divided into 2 groups: group 1 (output-based; drains removed when < 30 ml/day); and group 2 (early-removal; at 3¿4 days postoperative).Group 1 consisted of 25 patients with a mean age of 53.4 +/-10.8 years and a mean bmi of 25.3 +/- 4.21 kg/m2.Group 2 consisted of 24 patients with a mean age of 52.6 +/- 18.9 years and a mean bmi of 26.2 +/- 5.41 kg/m2.All mastectomies and subpectoral pockets were performed using an ultrasonic scalpel focus ultracision harmonic scalpel (ethicon); a single drain was applied in the prepectoral area using the blake silicon flat drain 19g (ethicon), and the wounds were closed intradermally.The patients were implanted with a competitor¿s tissue expander.All patients were followed from the day before surgery until wound healing.Complications include infection (n=1) and complicated wound healing (n=2).In conclusion, the data suggest that it is clinically safe and preferable to remove drains early after breast cancer surgery.Better results were obtained for patients in the early-removal group, even when statistical significance was not obtained for each variable.Moreover, the potential improvement in qol for patients with breast cancer has a significant value.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Product complaint # (b)(4).Additional information has been requested and received.If further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.Were the cases discussed in this article previously reported to ethicon? if yes, please provide a complaint reference number.The cases discussed in our article have not previously been reported to ethicon.Does the surgeon believe that ethicon products involved: unknown blake drain caused and/or contributed to the post-operative complications (infection, wound healing complication) described in the article? we don't believe that the ethicon drains used caused and/or contributed to the postop complications.Does the surgeon believe there was any deficiency with the ethicon products: unknown blake drain used in this procedure? we believe there wasn't any deficiency with ethicon blake drain used in our procedures.We believe it is an excellent product.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
BLAKE DRAIN UNKNOWN PRODUCT
Type of Device
CATHETER, IRRIGATION
Manufacturer (Section D)
ETHICON INC.
1000 route 202
raritan NJ 08869
Manufacturer (Section G)
DEGANIA SILICON LTD.-INDIA
251, sector-6, imt manesar
gurgaon 12205 0
IN   122050
Manufacturer Contact
elba bello
1000 route 202
raritan, NJ 08869
MDR Report Key13172691
MDR Text Key284622811
Report Number2210968-2022-00100
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code GBX
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeIT
PMA/PMN Number
CL I EXEMPT
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Literature
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/05/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received01/05/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received01/31/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention; Required Intervention;
-
-