|
According to the reporter, during an open total gastrectomy, while performing the end-to-side esophagojejunostomy, the device stapled completely but the blade did not cut.To resolve the issue, the surgeon did a manual resection.There was a no patient injury.
|
|
Additional information: d9, g3, h3, h6, h3 evaluation summary: medtronic conducted an investigation based upon all information received.The device and a photo were available for evaluation.Visual inspection noted the cut ring was partially severed or intact.Functionally, the wing nut and safety functioned properly.The green indicator was visible within the window when the wing nut was fully closed.The instrument was applied to test media.Pusher-fingers and knife advanced when handles were squeezed.The knife cut the test media cleanly and completely.The device produced all audible, tactile and visual indicators during the functional testing.It was reported that the device was fired, but the knife did not transect the tissue.The reported issue was confirmed.The product analysis noted evidence that the device was not used as intended.This issue may occur if the instrument handle compression is not completed or if the instrument is applied against an excessive amount of tissue during the clinical application.The manufacturing records for each device are thoroughly reviewed prior to release to ensure that it meets all medtronic quality specifications.The instructions included with this device provide the following guidance: when firing the stapler, make sure to fully squeeze the instrument handle until the metal underside of the handle contacts the stapler body to the fullest extent.Partial or incomplete handle squeezes may result in unacceptable staple formation and/or incomplete knife cut.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|