• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: NUVASIVE SPECIALIZED ORTHOPEDICS, INC. MAGEC SPINAL BRACING AND DISTRACTION SYSTEM; GROWING ROD SYSTEM- MAGNETIC ACTUATION

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

NUVASIVE SPECIALIZED ORTHOPEDICS, INC. MAGEC SPINAL BRACING AND DISTRACTION SYSTEM; GROWING ROD SYSTEM- MAGNETIC ACTUATION Back to Search Results
Model Number MC2-5090S
Medical Device Problem Code Mechanical Problem (1384)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Failure of Implant (1924); Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available (4581)
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Event or Problem Description
Information was received that the rod did not fully achieve the desired distraction increments during lengthening sessions.The device was removed for final fusion.Additionally, it was reported that there was organic matter buildup around the rod and tissue discoloration.No patient adverse reaction or impact was reported.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The device has not been returned for evaluation.The root cause is unable to be determined at this time.If any additional information is provided, a supplemental report will be submitted.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Upon return, visual inspection of the rod revealed that it was partially distracted with score marks consistent with expected markings due to incremental distraction.Inspection also revealed there was no visible "cellulose buildup" to confirm the reported issue.X-ray images of the internal components showed no damage and revealed the rod was partly distracted.Functional testing revealed the rod was unable to be distracted or retracted with the manual distractor or electronic remote controller (erc) as the rod was found to be jammed.To complete a thorough inspection, the rod was sectioned and debris buildup was found around the distraction rod.It was also determined that the rod could not be separated from the housing tube without use of high force.This indicates bending forces were applied to the distraction rod causing it to contact the housing, possibly from patient activity.Review of the device history records revealed no discrepancies related to this complaint.The rod was manufactured in accordance with the specified requirements and met all of the required quality inspections.
 
Event or Problem Description
No additional information was provided.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MAGEC SPINAL BRACING AND DISTRACTION SYSTEM
Common Device Name
GROWING ROD SYSTEM- MAGNETIC ACTUATION
Manufacturer (Section D)
NUVASIVE SPECIALIZED ORTHOPEDICS, INC.
101 enterprise dr, ste 100
aliso viejo CA 92656
Manufacturer (Section G)
NUVASIVE SPECIALIZED ORTHOPEDICS, INC.
101 enterprise dr, ste 100
aliso viejo CA 92656
Manufacturer Contact
geoff gannon
101 enterprise dr, ste 100
aliso viejo, CA 92656
8583448112
MDR Report Key13182236
Report Number3006179046-2022-00106
Device Sequence Number2007817
Product Code PGN
UDI-Device Identifier00887517834041
UDI-Public887517834041
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateID
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K171791
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2018
Device Explanted Year2021
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 02/21/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model NumberMC2-5090S
Device Lot Number8071101
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer01/12/2022
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 12/13/2021
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer02/17/2022
Initial Report FDA Received Date01/06/2022
Supplement Report FDA Received Date02/21/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured07/11/2018
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age12 YR
Patient SexFemale
Patient Weight32 KG
-
-