• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CHRISTOPH MIETHKE GMBH & CO KG PROGAV 2.0 SYS SA2.0 20 & CONTROL RES.; HYDROCEPHALUS MANAGEMENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CHRISTOPH MIETHKE GMBH & CO KG PROGAV 2.0 SYS SA2.0 20 & CONTROL RES.; HYDROCEPHALUS MANAGEMENT Back to Search Results
Model Number FX602T
Medical Device Problem Codes Mechanical Problem (1384); Infusion or Flow Problem (2964)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Hydrocephalus (3272)
Date of Event 12/08/2021
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation: visual inspection: no significant deformations or damage of the valves were detected during the visual inspection in the control reservoir are visible deposits/blood.Permeability test: a permeability test has indicated that the progav 2.0 shunt system is permeable.Computer controlled test: to investigate the claim of under-drainage, the opening pressure is measured using a miethke computer controlled testing apparatus which simulates a cerebrospinal fluid flow.The valves are tested in both the horizontal as well as the vertical positions.During the test bench measurement, a blockage of the progav 2.0 valve appeared.Thus, testing was no longer applicable.The results show that the shunt assistant 2.0 operates within the accepted tolerance in the vertical position.Adjustment test: the progav 2.0 was tested and is not adjustable throughout the normal range.Klick force and brake function test: the brake functionality test has shown that the brake function is operational; however, the braking force cannot be measured due to the non-adjustability of the valve.Internal inspection: after dismantling of the valves, significant deposits were found in both valves.Results: we would like to point out to you in advance that the permeability test has already been performed after the revision on clinic part.We are assuming that the deposits detected within the valves have caused the functional impairment.Deposits caused by natural substances in the cerebrospinal fluid, such as protein, blood or tissue particles, are among the known and unavoidable risks and side effects of hydrocephalus therapy.Small amounts of non-visible deposits/proteins might compromise the integrity of the valve.We can exclude a defect at the time of release.The shunt system met all specifications of the final inspection when released from christoph miethke gmbh & co.Kg.No further regulatory actions are required from our point of view.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that a progav 2.0 shunt system (part # (b)(4)) was implanted during a procedure performed on (b)(6) 2020.According to the complainant, the shunt system was believed to be operated in underdrainage and difficult to adjust.The patient underwent a revision procedure on (b)(6) 2021.The complaint device was returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.No patient complications were reported as a result of the revision procedure.Age: (b)(6), height: 76 centimeters (cm) weight: (b)(6) (kg), gender: female.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PROGAV 2.0 SYS SA2.0 20 & CONTROL RES.
Common Device Name
HYDROCEPHALUS MANAGEMENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
CHRISTOPH MIETHKE GMBH & CO KG
ulanenweg 2
potsdam, 14469
GM  14469
Manufacturer (Section G)
CHRISTOPH MIETHKE GMBH & CO KG
ulanenweg 2
potsdam, 14469
GM   14469
Manufacturer Contact
joerg knebel
ulanenweg 2
potsdam, 14469
GM   14469
MDR Report Key13195349
Report Number3004721439-2021-00350
Device Sequence Number6046160
Product Code JXG
UDI-Device Identifier04041906503222
UDI-Public4041906503222
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryGM
PMA/510(K) Number
K190174
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2020
Device Explanted Year2021
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Foreign,User Facility,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date (Section B) 01/07/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date04/28/2025
Device Model NumberFX602T
Device Catalogue NumberFX602T
Device Lot Number20047620
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer12/10/2021
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 12/10/2021
Initial Report FDA Received Date01/07/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured04/30/2020
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age20 MO
Patient SexFemale
Patient Weight8 KG
-
-