|
Attorney alleges that on (b)(6) 2015, the patient was implanted with two bard/davol ventralight st meshes in the course of a hernia repair surgery.It is alleged that further to the implantation with the product, the patient suffered the development of chronic pain, inflammation, swelling, bowel obstruction, gastrointestinal malfunction and hernia recurrence, necessitating further reparative surgery which occurred on (b)(6) 2018.It is alleged that subsequent to the latter surgery, the patient has continued to suffer from chronic pain, inflammation, swelling, bowel obstruction, gastrointestinal malfunction, and hernia recurrence.It is alleged that the patient has suffered injuries, losses and damages resulting from numerous defects in the product that create an unreasonably high risk of injury with severe permanent adverse health consequences.Attorney alleges that the patient experienced severe pain and suffering, including chronic pain.It is also alleged that the patient was treated with a course of hospitalization, diagnostic imaging, revision surgery, serum testing, antibiotics, analgesics and rest.Attorney alleges that the patient will require further invasive repair surgery, physiotherapy, rehabilitation and will continue to require other medical care.It is also alleged that the device was defective.
|
|
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges adverse patient outcome associated with the hernia mesh used to treat the patient including permanent injury, hernia recurrence, bowel obstruction, pain and surgical intervention.The instructions-for-use (ifu) supplied with the device lists hernia recurrence and inflammation as possible complications.This emdr represents the bard/davol ventralight st mesh (device #2).An additional emdr was submitted to represent the bard/davol ventralight st mesh (device #1).Should additional information be provided, a supplemental emdr will be submitted.Not returned.
|