|
|
| Catalog Number |
0010212 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Defective Device (2588); Patient-Device Incompatibility (2682); Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Adhesion(s) (1695); Pain (1994); Scar Tissue (2060); Seroma (2069); Hernia (2240); Insufficient Information (4580)
|
| Date of Event |
01/16/2020
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges "past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient"; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.This emdr represents the bard/davol ventrio mesh (device #2).An additional emdr was submitted to represent the bard flat mesh (device #1).Should additional information be provided, a supplemental emdr will be submitted.Not returned.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for the implant of unspecified bard mesh (bard flat mesh) and bard/davol ventrio on (b)(6) 2018 and/or (b)(6) 2019.As reported the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against both devices.Attorney alleges general allegations for "past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient." it is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges "past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient"; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.This emdr represents the bard/davol ventrio mesh (device # 2).An additional emdr was submitted to represent the bard flat mesh (device # 1).Should additional information be provided, a supplemental emdr will be submitted.Addendum: this supplemental emdr is submitted to document additional information provided.Root cause is inconclusive, no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.Note, the manufacturing date (15-jan-2017) is considered to be a best estimate.This supplemental emdr represents the bard/davol - ventrio mesh (device 2).An additional supplemental emdr was submitted to represent the bard/davol - bard flat mesh (device 1).Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for the implant of unspecified bard mesh (bard flat mesh) and bard/davol ventrio on (b)(6) 2018 and/or (b)(6) 2019.As reported the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against both devices.Attorney alleges general allegations for "past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient." it is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.Addendum per additional information provided: on (b)(6) 2018 ¿ patient was diagnosed with symptomatic ectopic endometrioma of right rectus abdomen thereby underwent open repair with implant of bard flat mesh (device 1).Per operative notes, ¿ rectus abdominis musculature fascia was resected and abdominal wall defect was reconstructed with bard flat mesh (device 1) tacked and sutured.¿ on (b)(6) 2019 ¿ patient was diagnosed with incisional hernia and pain thereby underwent open repair with removal of mesh (device 1) and implant of ventrio mesh (device 2).Per operative notes, ¿ the mesh (device 1) was noted free floating in the subcutaneous tissue attached to scar tissues.The mesh with adhesions (device 1) were removed.The hernia sac was dissected and seroma was drained.The fascial defect was repaired with ventrio mesh (device 2) and sutures.¿ on (b)(6) 2020 - patient was diagnosed with recurrent incisional hernia and pain thereby underwent open repair with implant of ventrio mesh (device 3).Per operative notes, ¿ the seroma surrounding the scar tissues was again noted and drained.Adhesions between omentum and mesh (device 2) was removed.The mesh (device 2) was intact with good quality and defect was closed with sutures and ventrio mesh (device 3) was placed.¿.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|