|
It was reported that during an arthroscopy, when the screw 'biosure ha' was through the bone tunnel, the screw broke.All pieces were removed from the patient by forceps.The procedure was completed with an s+n backup device.No delay and no further complications were reported.The current status of the patient is good.
|
|
It was reported that during an arthroscopy, when the screw 'biosure ha' was through the bone tunnel, the screw broke.All pieces were removed from the patient with forceps.The procedure was completed with a s+n backup device.No delay and no further complications were reported.The current status of the patient is good.
|
|
Internal complaint reference (b)(4).The reported device was received for evaluation.It was determined the device did not contribute to the reported event.A complaint history review concluded this was a repeat issue.A review of device records showed there were no indications to suggest that the product did not meet manufacturing specification upon release for distribution.The instructions for use was reviewed and found to include conditions of off label use and technique specifics, as well as precautions and warnings related to the use of the device.A risk management review found that the reported failure was documented appropriately, and there were no indications to suggest the anticipated risk is not adequate.A review of the polymer found that the storage requirements for the material are specified, and the material must comply with provided percentage composition specifications as measured by ash test.A review of the customer provided image found labelling confirming the product identification information.The screw is fractured on the distal end, and there is debris in the threads.A visual inspection of the returned device found that it is not in its original packaging.The screw is fractured on the distal end, and there is debris in the threads.Based on the condition of the product material found during visual inspection, additional material testing is not required.A review of the complaint revealed there were no patient injuries reported and no apparent patient impact based on the details provided.Therefore, no further medical assessment is warranted.The complaint was confirmed, and the root cause was associated with unintended use of the device.Factors that could have contributed to the reported event include excessive force on the device, excessive torque on the device, attempted correction of a damaged device, off-axis insertion, improper preparation of the insertion site, or an inadvertent impact event inconsistent with normal use.Please refer to the instructions for use for recommendations on proper use of the device and potential troubleshooting methods to prevent future reoccurrence of the reported event.No containment or corrective actions are recommended at this time.
|