|
|
| Model Number |
SMXP150RH |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Material Rupture (1546)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Deformity/ Disfigurement (2360)
|
| Date of Event |
11/30/2021
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Since the device has not been returned for analysis, no product failure analysis can be conducted, and no determination of possible contributing factors can be made.As such, the investigation will be closed.If the complaint device is received in the future, the investigation will be reopened and conducted as appropriate.A manufacturing record evaluation (mre) was performed, and no anomalies were found related to this complaint.In addition, the mre verifies that the device was manufactured in accordance with documented specification and procedures.Reason for device explant and/or reoperation: material rupture.Manufacturer¿s reference number: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that a (b)(6) year old caucasian female patient, who's undergone primary breast reconstruction with two 750cc artoura breast tissue expanders, suffered right breast implant deflation, post-procedure.As a result, the patient underwent removal and replacement with an unspecified silicone implant on (b)(6) 2021.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
On (b)(6) 2022, the mentor failure analysis lab received the device for evaluation.On (b)(6) 2022, the product investigation was completed.Device investigation summary: the product was returned to mentor for evaluation.Mentor conducted a visual inspection and leak testing of the returned tissue expander.Visual analysis of the returned sample revealed that no damage or anomalies were observed on the artoura ss, t exp, hp,750cc tissue expander.Leak testing was performed, in accordance with mentor procedures, and a tear was noted on the anterior aspect measuring less than 0.1 cm.As the authorization form for examination was not received the product evaluation lab couldn´t identify a conclusion due to the specific nature of this deflation.The evaluation was limited to non-destructive testing.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device lot number, and no non-conformances were identified.Although no conclusion could be reached on the cause of the reported event, the instructions for use contain the following caution: causes of deflation of tissue expander include but are not limited to the following events: crease fold failure, intraoperative or postoperative trauma, excessive stresses or manipulations as may occur during normal, daily routines including customary and purposeful trauma such as that which can occur during vigorous exercise, athletics, etc.As part of mentor¿s quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|