Reported event: an event regarding limb length discrepancy involving a jts proximal tibial, femoral stem was reported.The event was confirmed by x ray review.Method & results: device evaluation and results: not performed as product was not returned.Clinician review: the implant in situ was for jts proximal tibial replacement which was inserted on (b)(6)2016.The surgeon reported leg length discrepancy due to fast growing of the patient.The ct scan provided shows that the length of the affect femur is 449mm which is 29mm shorter than the opposite femur which is 478mm.However, the affect tibial is 424mm which is 27mm longer than the opposite tibial which is 397mm.In overall, the affected lower limb has similar leg length as the opposite limb but the knee joint is much higher which might affect the patella tracking.Therefore, the radiographic review can confirm the clinical report and reason for revision.Device history review: review of the product history records indicate the device was manufactured and accepted into final stock with no reported discrepancies.Complaint history review: there have been no other events for the lot referenced.Conclusion it was confirmed " there is no issue with the extension mechanism.The problem is the patient¿s growth itself: due to the fact that the patient grew a lot since the implantation[.] the femur shows a significant length discrepancy which cannot be balanced with the extension mechanism".The device in situ is a jts, proximal tibia therefore the 'tibial' limb length discrepancy can be resolved via non invasive lengthening procedure, however the 'femoral' limb length discrepancy in the affected leg cannot.The clinical consultant confirmed this by completing a review of the x ray imaging provided ,stating " the affected femur is 449mm which is 29mm shorter than the opposite femur which is 478mm.However, the affected tibial is 424mm which is 27mm longer than the opposite tibial which is 397mm".The exact cause of the 'femoral' limb length discrepancy could not be determined because insufficient information was provided.Additional information including operative reports, pathology reports, progress notes, are needed to fully investigate the event.If further information becomes available or the product is returned, this investigation will be re-opened.
|