|
This mdr is being submitted as part of a retrospective review of all 2016-2017 complaint files that rw mic is conducting.The complaint specialist determined a re-assessment of the mdr decision for this complaint was needed and that, this complaint due to a if a similar failure or malfunction were to occur with the same or similar device, could death, life threatening injury or life-threatening illness occur?" previously in 2017, the complaint specialist at that time, determined an mdr was not needed due to "no injury to patient or staff.Backup device readily available for use.Minimal delay, minimal risk to patient.Procedure completed as scheduled." facts of the case as reported to richard wolf by the user facility: "there was small black speckles in the patient.They believe it is part of the insulation from the scope." additional details: will the device be returned? yes.Was the device being used during a procedure when the issue occurred? yes.The speckles that were sent in with the scope did not come from a patient's bladder.We flushed the scope with water a syringe and these speckles became present in the speciment cup.We sealed the cup with a lid and put in biohazard bag.But, this is the same substance that was visualized by doctor and staff on three patient's before they called me (sales rep) to come and inspect their scope.Specifically, was the device being used on a patient when the issue occured? yes.Was there any injury or illness to the patient or other personnel due to the reported issue? no.No patient injury or illness by any of the three patients did the issue cause a delay in the procedure being performed that put the patient at risk? no.This issue did not cause a delay or put the patient's at risk.The procedure (office cystoscopy) was not delayed except that they took a few extra minutes to determine if they were seeing the black speckles correctly or note.Did the delay put the patient at risk? no.Was there a similar back-up device available for use? yes they own three 7305.001.So, back-up was available but not necessary.Was the scheduled procedure completed? yes.Procedure was completed how was the patient anesthetized? no anesthesia except for lidocaine on bladder prior to procedure.Recently (11/30/2021) rwmic had a similar complaint, black specks seen in patient and working channel.According to the device evaluation: "leakage of working channel resulted in graphite spill that looked like a black fluid.Graphite powder is used at the vertebra to lubricate the deflection and move it smoother and as well when the shaft is manufactured for lubricating all its components (the picture bundle, working channel and illumination fiber lights).Damage occurred either during reprocessing when a cleaning brush was used inside the working channel and this created a tear inside the working channel or during a procedure with an instrument prematurely opened inside the scope that created the tear.In order to repair the scope, a shaft replacement is required.No harm to patient was reported.
|