Model Number HOYA NC1-SP (+17.50 D) |
Device Problem
Misfocusing (1401)
|
Patient Problem
Visual Impairment (2138)
|
Event Date 11/24/2021 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
Implant date: (b)(6) 2021.Date of event: (b)(6) 2021.Reportedly, a refractive error (minus 3.00 dpt) was caused by a lens dislocation (anterior).This was noticed around 5 days after the intraocular lense (iol) nanex multisert (model nc1-sp, serial number (b)(4)) was implanted on (b)(6) 2021.According to the reporter, the device was explanted on (b)(6) 2021 and replaced during the same surgery.No permanent or negative impact on patient health is expected.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This initial emdr is being submitted to fda for outside us like products reporting."lens dislocation" is indicated as a potential malfunction related to the iol, as covered under the warnings section of the product's instructions for use (ifu).Manufacturer's codes for investigation type, findings and conclusion are pending the completion of the product investigation.Once the investigation is completed, a follow-up report will be submitted to fda which will include the manufacturer's codes for investigation type, findings and conclusion.
|
|
Event Description
|
Implant date: (b)(6) 2021; date of event: (b)(6) 2021.Reportedly, a refractive error (minus 3.00 dpt) was caused by a lens dislocation (anterior).This was noticed around 5 days after the intraocular lense (iol) nanex multisert (model nc1-sp, serial number (b)(6) was implanted on (b)(6) 2021.According to the reporter, the device was explanted on (b)(6) 2021 and replaced during the same surgery.No permanent or negative impact on patient health is expected.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This follow-up #1 emdr is being submitted to fda for a reportable event that occurred outside of the usa.The report includes corrected information and additional information not available/included in the initial report.Corrected information: h3 - device evaluated by manufacturer: corrected to yes.Portions of the product were returned to the manufacturer.The investigation was conducted, with the methods and results as noted below.The optic was cut during explantation and only part of the optic and one haptic were returned.The injector was not returned.No abnormalities were found in production and inspection records of the product.(serial no.: (b)(6) ; model: nc1-sp).In addition, research in our complaint database indicated there were not any similar events in the same production lot number.From our investigation, we couldn't confirm the reported event.The exact root cause of the event was not determined.However, based on available information, we believe this event was not caused by our product quality.A review of the most recent complaint trending data indicates that no significant trends have been identified at this time and no capa is required as part of the product evaluation.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|