• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. SENSAR IOL; INTRAOCULAR LENS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. SENSAR IOL; INTRAOCULAR LENS Back to Search Results
Model Number AR40M
Medical Device Problem Code Break (1069)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 12/21/2021
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
If implanted, give date: not applicable, as lens was removed/replaced in the initial surgery.If explanted, give date: not applicable, as lens was removed/replaced in the initial surgery.(b)(4).An attempt has been made to obtain the missing information; however, the information was not provided.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that the intraocular lens (iol) was inserted and removed from the patient's left eye as the surgeon noticed a broken haptic and part of the lens (lens was damaged).Another lens of same model was placed as the replacement during the same procedure without any issues.Account provided that the lens was possibly loaded incorrectly; however, the user could not confirm the statement.A suture was placed as a standard of care.No further information was provided.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Section d9: device available for evaluation: yes.Section d9: returned to manufacturer on: jan 12, 2022.Section h3: device evaluated by manufacturer: yes.Device evaluation: the product was returned to the manufacturing site for evaluation.Visual inspection under magnification revealed viscoelastic residue on the optic body and haptics and that the lens was received cut into three pieces, which is consistent with a lens handled during removal.Further inspection revealed a damaged haptic and a detached haptic.Based on the return condition of the lens, no further product evaluation could be performed.The complaint issue lens damaged could not be confirmed.The complaint issue haptic damaged, can be confirmed; however this may be attributed to handling during removal.Manufacturing record review: the manufacturing records for the intraocular lens were reviewed.The product was manufactured and released according to specification.The search revealed no additional investigation request (ir) for this production order number has been received.Conclusion: as a result of the investigation there is no indication of a product quality deficiency.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SENSAR IOL
Common Device Name
INTRAOCULAR LENS
Manufacturer (Section D)
AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC.
road 402 north, anasco ind. pk
anasco PR 00610
Manufacturer Contact
somyata nagpal
31 technology drive
irvine, CA 92618
7142478552
MDR Report Key13243191
Report Number3012236936-2022-00122
Device Sequence Number14640958
Product Code HQL
UDI-Device Identifier05050474501836
UDI-Public(01)05050474501836(17)261104
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateAZ
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P980040
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,User Facility
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 03/05/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model NumberAR40M
Device Catalogue NumberAR40M00010
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer01/12/2022
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 12/21/2021
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer02/23/2022
Initial Report FDA Received Date01/12/2022
Supplement Report FDA Received Date03/07/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured11/04/2021
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexMale
-
-