| Model Number |
232460 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Break (1069)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
01/07/2022
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported by the affiliate in (b)(6) that during an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery on (b)(6) 2022, it was observed that the 4.5 longer tip beath pin device broke.There were no fragments generated.Another like device was used to complete the procedure with a delay of five minutes.There were no adverse patient consequences reported.No additional information was provided.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Udi: (b)(4).To date the device has not been returned.If the device or further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.D4: the lot/serial number was reported as unknown on the initial report; and has been updated accordingly.Udi: (b)(4).The lot was unknown.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.H10 additional narrative: h4: the device manufacture date was reported as unknown on the initial report; and has been updated accordingly.Investigation summary: the product was returned to mitek for evaluation.Mitek then conducted visual inspection of device received and photo provided by the customer.The device was received and evaluated in westchester.The tip of the device was broken.The complaint reported was confirmed.The photo provided by the customer showed the broken condition.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device lot number:5l35681, and no nonconformances were identified.The possible root cause can be attributed when the device being mishandled on hard surface with heavily force causing breakage.Besides, possibility of mishandling, we cannot discern a root cause for this failure mode.As per ifu, inspect the instruments before use for integrity and compatibility in order to ensure proper functionality and safety.Place the instrument in the appropriate location within the sterilization tray.During the cleaning process, inspect the instruments after each cleaning cycle to ensure proper functionality function and safety.If you suspect a problem, set aside the instrument for repair.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as apropriate.H10 additional narrative: investigation summary the product was returned to mitek for evaluation.Mitek then conducted visual inspection of device received and photo provided by the customer.The device was received and evaluated.It was determined that the tip of the device was broken.The complaint reported was confirmed.The photo provided by the customer showed the broken condition.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device lot number: 5l35681, and no nonconformances were identified.The possible root cause can be attributed when the device being mishandled on hard surface with heavily force causing breakage.Besides, possibility of mishandling, we cannot discern a root cause for this failure mode.As per ifu, inspect the instruments before use for integrity and compatibility in order to ensure proper functionality and safety.Place the instrument in the appropriate location within the sterilization tray.During the cleaning process, inspect the instruments after each cleaning cycle to ensure proper functionality function and safety.If you suspect a problem, set aside the instrument for repair.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|