Information was received from multiple sources (patient, manufacturer representative, healthcare provider) regarding a patient who was implanted with an implantable neurostimulator (ins) for non-malignant pain.It was reported that the patient is non-complaint. the day after the patient's first surgery he was outside working in his yard and cutting grass.He also stated he was not charging or using the stimulator because it was not working.Patient also has difficulty saying how he is really feeling, and he was not saying that he was not getting any pain relief.The patient was not getting efficacy and after trying to reprogram the patient.Impedances and lead connections were checked at all programming sessions.The manufacturer representative was able to get some coverage in the cervical area, but then the patient told the office that he was not getting pain relief.The office decided to get images and realized that the leads had moved down significantly out of the cervical space. the health care professional feels that the patient's non-compliance and not following post-op instructions may have caused the lead migration. the physician decided to replace the percut aneous leads with a paddle lead which resolved the therapy issue.This replacement took place on (b)(6) 2022.
|
Concomitant medical products: product id: 977a275, serial#: (b)(4), implanted: (b)(6) 2021, product type: lead.Product id: 977a275, serial#: (b)(4), implanted: (b)(6) 2021, product type: lead.Other relevant device(s) are: product id: 977a275, serial/lot #: (b)(4), ubd: 23-aug-2025, udi#: (b)(4); product id: 977a275, serial/lot #: (b)(4), ubd: 23-aug-2025, udi#: (b)(4).If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|