• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PHILIPS MEDICAL SYSTEMS NEDERLAND B.V. BRILLIANCE; SYSTEM, X-RAY, TOMOGRAPHY, COMPUTED

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PHILIPS MEDICAL SYSTEMS NEDERLAND B.V. BRILLIANCE; SYSTEM, X-RAY, TOMOGRAPHY, COMPUTED Back to Search Results
Model Number BRILLIANCE 64 UPGRADES
Device Problems Moisture or Humidity Problem (2986); Unintended Electrical Shock (4018)
Patient Problems Electric Shock (2554); No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 12/20/2021
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
We have not completed our investigation of this event.We will file a follow-up emdr at the completion of the investigation.Internal cross reference: complaint (b)(4).Date of report: 20220114.
 
Event Description
This complaint has been evaluated based on the information provided.The issue reported was that when the operator was pressing the gantry panel with their finger to move the table, the e-stop opened and the operator alleged they received a shock.The extent of the alleged injury is not known at this time.Based on the available information, this issue has been determined to be a reportable event.This event is currently under investigation.
 
Event Description
On (b)(6) 2021, the operator's foot made contact with the base of the table, the emergency stop (e-stop) opened (unknown cause) and the operator alleged they received a shock.The technician then walked to the emergency room (er) for observation but was not admitted.Multiple attempts were made to verify the extent of the alleged shock, however, the customer did not respond nor provide additional information.Engineering reviewed the information within this complaint record.The identified issue would not raise harm of electrical shock to a patient, operator, bystander, or service personnel.The humidity in the gantry room was 19%.This is significantly lower than the philips specification range (35%-70%).The shock the operator most likely received is human body electrostatic discharge (esd).Therefore, this issue has been determined to not be a reportable event.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional manufacturer narrative: on 20-dec-2021, the operator's foot made contact with the base of the table, the emergency stop (e-stop) opened and the operator alleged they received a shock.The operator then walked to the emergency room (er) for observation but was not admitted.Multiple attempts were made to verify the extent of the alleged shock, however, the customer did not respond nor provide additional information.On 22-dec-2021, the philips field service engineer (fse) reported to the site to inspect the couch and gantry grounding cables for defects.Further investigation was performed to verify that grounding was installed according to philips requirements.The fse also checked for loose or damaged cables in couch.No defects with the couch or gantry grounding cables were identified that would cause shock as described by the operator.On 05-jan-2022, the fse along with the hospital's electrician and 3rd party service organization, performed an electrical audit on the incoming power and internal power and grounding cables which found the humidity in the gantry room was at 19% which is below philips humidity specification which is 35% to 70%.There is no information that the site has addressed the humidity issue.Philips engineering reviewed the information available and concluded: extent of injury (alleged shock) is unknown, the operator walked to the er (emergency room) for observation only and was not admitted.One occurrence reported by the customer.The fse and iss (3rd party service organization) confirmed no defects were found that would cause the alleged shock.The air was too dry (actual humidity is around 17% ~ 19%, proper humidity requirement per philips specification is 35% ~ 70%) which could contribute to human body electrostatic discharge (esd).Therefore, the alleged shock the operator received was likely esd due to the humidity issue.Probable cause: use error - failure to maintain philips recommended room humidity level.This event reported did not pose risk to health to patients, users, or bystanders, did not allege a serious injury or death and would not cause or contribute to a serious injury or death if the reported issue recurred.Therefore this event is not considered reportable.Internal cross reference: complaint pr# (b)(4).Date of report (b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
BRILLIANCE
Type of Device
SYSTEM, X-RAY, TOMOGRAPHY, COMPUTED
Manufacturer (Section D)
PHILIPS MEDICAL SYSTEMS NEDERLAND B.V.
veenpluis 4-6
best 5684 PC
NL  5684 PC
Manufacturer (Section G)
PHILIPS MEDICAL SYSTEMS NEDERLAND B.V.
veenpluis 4-6
best 5684 PC
NL   5684 PC
Manufacturer Contact
beth johnson
100 park avenue, suite 300
orange village, OH 44122
MDR Report Key13258838
MDR Text Key283830608
Report Number3015777306-2022-00001
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code JAK
UDI-Device Identifier00884838083325
UDI-Public00884838083325
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K033326
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Biomedical Engineer
Type of Report Initial,Followup
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received01/14/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberBRILLIANCE 64 UPGRADES
Device Catalogue Number728231
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received12/20/2021
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-