|
EXACTECH, INC. TRULIANT PS POR FEM PS POR LEFT SZ 2.5; PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Model Number |
TRULIANT PS POR FEM PS POR LEFT SZ 2.5 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Failure of Implant (1924)
|
| Date of Event |
12/23/2021
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Concomitant medical products: truliant tib imp ps insert sz 2.5 10mm (cat # 02-022-35-2510 / serial # (b)(4)), truliant por tib tray size 2.5f/1.5t (cat # 02-022-55-2515 / serial # (b)(4)).Additional information, including the product investigation, will be submitted within 30 days of receipt.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
As reported, a (b)(6), female patient had a revision due to instability of the knee.This is a well fixated porous femur and tibia less than a year old.Surgeon removed the femoral and tibial porous components.Patient revised to a size 2 condylar constrained femur and he size 2f/1t truliant tibial fit tray with a 15 mm condylar constrained insert.There was no breakage to the device.There was no surgical delay/ prolongation.Patient was last known to be in stable condition following the event.The devices will be return.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
After further review of additional information received the following sections d4, d9, g3, g6, h2, h3, h4 and h6 have been updated accordingly.As reported, a 59 years old, female patient had a revision due to instability of the knee.This is a well fixated porous femur and tibia less than a year old.Surgeon removed the femoral and tibial porous components.Patient revised to a size 2 condylar constrained femur and he size 2f/1t truliant tibial fit tray with a 15 mm condylar constrained insert.There was no breakage to the device.There was no surgical delay/prolongation.Patient was last known to be in stable condition following the event.The devices will be return.Upon review of all available information, there is no evidence to suggest that a design or manufacturing issue caused or contributed to this event.The reported revision was likely the result of underlying patient factors, which led to instability of the joint.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|