|
(b)(4).If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.Additional information was requested, and the following was obtained: we got this info from the actual product on 18_january_2022 lot number: unknown rembtp.What was used to complete the procedure? =>no further information is available.What tissue was being approximated or sutured when it broke? no further information is available.Procedure name and date? no further information is available.Event date? no further information is available.Lot number? no further information is available.Device return status/follow up? we regularly contact with sales rep about the device returning.Attempts have been made to retrieve the device.To date the device has not been returned.If the device or further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).Date sent to the fda: 02/24/2022.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon inc, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon inc or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.H3 investigation summary: visual analysis of the returned product revealed that one empty foil packet, a used needle/suture piece and a winding former with two re-parked used needles and three undispensed strands of product code j765 were received for evaluation.The product code is single armed and each tray contains eight strands.Upon visual inspection of the returned sample, the needle/suture piece of the 12.75" was observed with body fluids, damaged at the surface and the end of the suture cutted and frizzy.After further evaluation crimping marks were observed on the surface suture possibly from a surgical instrument.Functional test could not be performed to this strand, due to condition observed.As with any device, care should be taken to avoid damage to the strand when handling.Avoid the crushing or crimping action of the surgical instruments, such as needle holders and forceps.The winding former contains three strands intact, the sutures were dispensed without problems and examined along to detect any issue related to reported complaint and no defect, damaged could be observed, the product code j765 contains an absorbable suture and due to the sample was received opened, the time of exposure could not be determined.Functional test was performed, to three strands and the tensile strength results were above the minimum requirements.As part of our quality process, the manufacturing records of this lot-serial number were reviewed, and the manufacturing standards were met prior to the release of this batch.As part of quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device, and no non-conformances were identified.
|