• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION PERCUFLEX URINARY DIVERSION STENT; CATHETER, NEPHROSTOMY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION PERCUFLEX URINARY DIVERSION STENT; CATHETER, NEPHROSTOMY Back to Search Results
Model Number M0061603350
Medical Device Problem Code Material Deformation (2976)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 11/08/2021
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).The returned percuflex urinary diversion stent was analyzed, and a visual evaluation noted that the shaft was detached or separates and only apportion of the shaft with the renal pigtail was returned and no kinks were observed.No other problems with the device were noted.The reported event was confirmed.Based on the most relevant information of the complaint event description, device analysis and including the product record review results, the device meets all manufacturing specifications required and passed all the controls and inspections, no abnormalities were reported during the assembly process.It was found that the device has the shaft detached or separated and turn black.According to the evidence, it is possible that operational factors, such as interacting of the device with other device, or handling or manipulating during it use could have caused this failure.Consequently affect the performance of the device.Review and analysis of all available information indicated that the root cause of the problems found is adverse event related to procedure since the adverse event occurred during the procedure and the device had no influence on event.A review of the manufacturing documentation for this device revealed that no anomalies or deviations related to the event occurred during manufacturing.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that a percuflex urinary diversion stent was used during a stent implantation procedure in the ureter performed on (b)(6) 2021.During procedure, it was found that one of the pigtail coils was slightly bent and could not be implanted.The procedure was successfully completed with another percuflex urinary diversion stent.There were no patient complications reported as a result of this event.The patient's condition at the conclusion of the procedure was reported to be as no patient injury.Please note, this has become reportable based on investigation results.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PERCUFLEX URINARY DIVERSION STENT
Common Device Name
CATHETER, NEPHROSTOMY
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
300 boston scientific way
marlborough MA 01752
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
2546 calle primera
alajuela
CS  
Manufacturer Contact
carole morley
300 boston scientific way
marlborough, MA 01752
5086834015
MDR Report Key13286301
Report Number3005099803-2022-00016
Device Sequence Number11832342
Product Code LJE
UDI-Device Identifier08714729821151
UDI-Public08714729821151
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryJA
PMA/510(K) Number
K830803
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date (Section B) 01/18/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date05/12/2024
Device Model NumberM0061603350
Device Catalogue Number160-335
Device Lot Number0028231205
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer12/06/2021
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Initial
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 12/23/2021
Initial Report FDA Received Date01/18/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured05/13/2021
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-