|
C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740 M.R.I. LOW-PROFILE IMPLANTABLE PORT, BROVIAC SINGLE-LUMEN, 6.6F; PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Model Number |
6603880 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Fluid/Blood Leak (1250); Difficult to Flush (1251); Material Puncture/Hole (1504); Suction Problem (2170); Migration (4003)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Extravasation (1842); Unspecified Infection (1930); Pain (1994)
|
| Date of Event |
02/13/2014
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
As the lot number for the device was not provided, a review of the device history records could not be performed.The sample was not returned to the manufacturer for inspection/evaluation.Therefore, the investigation of the reported event is inconclusive.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause for this event is unknown.The instructions for use (ifu) is adequate for the reported device/patient code(s) and provides general instructions for use, as well as warnings, precautions and potential complications associated with the device.Upon receipt of new or additional information, a follow-up report will be submitted as applicable.Device not returned.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported in an article in journal of "burden of complications from needle penetration of plastic ports in children", that the port allegedly had eight occurrences of posterior port perforation and one occurrences of leak, difficult to flush, suction issue and migration was noted.The patient reportedly experienced pain and diagnosed with extravasation and infection.The current status of the patient was unknown.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H10: nicole e.Sharp, e.Marty knott, priscilla thomas, douglas c.Rivard and shawn d.St.Peter (2014).Burden of complications from needle penetration of plastic ports in children.Journal of pediatric surgery, 49(5):763-5.Doi: 10.1016/j.Jpedsurg.2014.02.061 h10: manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was not requested as the lot number reported is unknown.Investigation summary: the physical device was not returned for evaluation.No photos were provided for review.Therefore, the investigation is inconclusive for the reported failure as no objective evidence was provided for review.Furthermore, clinical conditions alleged in the complaint cannot be confirmed.A definitive root cause could not be determined based upon the available information.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documentation (e.G., procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, nursing guide, and unit label) did not find any product labeling inadequacy.H11:section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported in an article in journal of "burden of complications from needle penetration of plastic ports in children", that the port allegedly eight occurrences of posterior port perforation and one occurrences of leak, difficult to flush, suction issue and migration was noted.The patient reportedly experienced pain and diagnosed with extravasation and infection.The current status of the patient was unknown.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported in an article in journal of "burden of complications from needle penetration of plastic ports in children", that the port allegedly eight occurrences of posterior port perforation and one occurrences of leak, difficult to flush, suction issue and migration was noted.The patient reportedly experienced pain and diagnosed with extravasation and infection.The current status of the patient was unknown.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H10: nicole e.Sharp, e.Marty knott, priscilla thomas, douglas c.Rivard and shawn d.St.Peter (2014).Burden of complications from needle penetration of plastic ports in children.Journal of pediatric surgery, 49(5):763-5.Doi: 10.1016/j.Jpedsurg.2014.02.061 h10: manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was not requested as the lot number reported is unknown.Investigation summary: the physical device was not returned for evaluation.No photos were provided for review.Therefore, the investigation is inconclusive for the reported failure as no objective evidence was provided for review.Furthermore, clinical conditions alleged in the complaint cannot be confirmed.A definitive root cause could not be determined based upon the available information.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documentation (e.G., procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, nursing guide, and unit label) did not find any product labeling inadequacy.H11:section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text : device not returned.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|