|
Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for this medwatch, a supplemental medwatch report will be filed as appropriate.Additional narrative: the actual device was returned for evaluation.The attachment device was evaluated and the reported condition that the equipment did not work was not confirmed.Therefore, an assignable root cause was not determined.However, during evaluation it was observed that the device was generating heat.The assignable root cause of this condition was determined to be traced to component failure due to wear.Udi: (b)(4).
|
|
It was reported from (b)(6) that during service and evaluation, it was determined that the burr attachment device was worn, was making excessive noise, heat, could not insert a cutter, the etching was illegible and incorrect, moving parts did not move smoothly, and had component damage.It was further determined that the device failed pretest for general condition, marking and labeling, check lengths marking: ¿l¿, check the tool coupling, and check of free movement.It was noted in the service order that the equipment did not work.This event did not occur during surgery.There was no patient involvement.There were no reports of injuries, medical intervention, or prolonged hospitalization.All available information has been disclosed.If additional information should become available, a supplemental medwatch will be submitted accordingly.
|