|
SIEMENS HEALTHCARE DIAGNOSTICS, INC. ATELLICA IM PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN (PSA); PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN IMMUNOASSAY
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Model Number |
N/A |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Low Test Results (2458)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
12/17/2021
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
The customer obtained a low atellica im prostate-specific antigen (psa) result for a patient sample on (b)(6) 2021 that was considered discordant when compared to the elevated result from an alternate method from (b)(6) 2021.The customer received a complaint from the patient.The same patient sample was repeated on a second atellica im on (b)(6) 2021 and the result was similar.The previous psa result from (b)(6) 2021 for this patient was reviewed.The sample was tested on the advia centaur xp instrument and the result was similar to the atellica im psa results (lower than the alternate method result).The discordant result was reported to the physician and questioned.There are no known reports of patient intervention or adverse health consequences due to the discordant psa results.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
An outside of the united states (ous) customer contacted the siemens customer care center to report discordant low atellica im prostate-specific antigen (psa) results when compared to the elevated result from an alternate method.The customer has performed an internal investigation.The customer reviewed the calibration, quality control data, and instrument status for dates (b)(6) 2021 and (b)(6) 2021 and no issues were observed.The customer has also reviewed other random psa samples.There were no changes in psa trends and the customer has not received any other queries.On (b)(6) 2021, the customer sent 5 recent random psa samples to other facilities with different platforms for concordance testing and no discordant results were observed.The ifu states in the interpretation of results section: "results of this assay should always be interpreted in conjunction with the patient's medical history, clinical presentation, and other findings." the ifu states in the limitations section: "note: do not interpret levels of psa as absolute evidence of the presence or the absence of malignant disease.Before treatment, patients with confirmed prostate carcinoma frequently have levels of psa within the range observed in healthy individuals.Elevated levels of psa can be observed in patients with nonmalignant diseases.Measurements of psa should always be used in conjunction with other diagnostic procedures, including information from the patient's clinical evaluation.The concentration of total psa in a given specimen determined with assays from different manufacturers can vary due to differences in assay methods, calibration, and reagent specificity.Total psa determined with different manufacturers' assays will vary depending on the method of standardization and antibody specificity." siemens healthcare diagnostics is investigating.Mdr 1219913-2022-00014 and mdr 1219913-2022-00016 were filed for the same event.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Siemens filed the initial mdr 1219913-2022-00015 on (b)(6) 2022.(b)(6) 2022.Additional information: an outside of the united states (ous) customer contacted the siemens customer care center to report discordant low atellica im prostate-specific antigen (psa) results when compared to the elevated result from an alternate method.The last name for the contact (chng) was provided.Section e1 was updated with the information.The customer would like to send a redraw sample from the patient to siemens for further interference study.Siemens healthcare diagnostics has requested information from the customer for investigation and evaluation of the issue.Mdr 1219913-2022-00014 supplemental report 1, mdr 1219913-2022-00015 supplemental report 1, and mdr 1219913-2022-00016 supplemental report 1 were filed for the same event.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Siemens filed the initial mdr 1219913-2022-00015 on january 20, 2022.Siemens filed the mdr 1219913-2022-00015 supplemental report 1 on february 14, 2022.March 02, 2022 additional information: an outside of the united states (ous) customer contacted the siemens customer care center to report discordant low atellica im prostate-specific antigen (psa) results when compared to the elevated result from an alternate method.The customer did not send a redraw sample from the patient to siemens for further interference study or the requested information for further evaluation.The customer had not provided any updates or responded to requests.Siemens investigated.The customer performed a mini comparison study with 5 alternate patient samples between atellica im and the alternate method.The results matched between the two methods.The studies performed by the customer do not indicate a lot specific or system specific issue but could be attributed to the differences in the two methods and a patient specific issue.Per atellica im psa ifu 10995416_en rev.04, 2021-05 warning statement: "the concentration of total psa in a given specimen, as determined by assays from different manufacturers, can vary due to differences in assay methods and reagent specificity.The results reported by the laboratory to the physician must include the identity of the assay for total psa used.Values obtained with different assay methods cannot be used interchangeably.If, in the course of monitoring a patient, the assay method used for determining serial levels of total psa is changed, the laboratory must perform additional testing to confirm baseline values." based on the available information the atellica im psa lot: 317 is performing as intended, a product performance issue has not been identified and this seems to be an isolated event.No further evaluation of the device is required.In section h6, investigation findings, and investigation conclusion codes were updated based on the investigation results.Mdr 1219913-2022-00014 supplemental report 2, mdr 1219913-2022-00015 supplemental report 2, and mdr 1219913-2022-00016 supplemental report 2 were filed for the same event.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|